How the sausage is made on Jones Street | Eastern North Carolina Now

Not a dime's worth of difference between D's and R's in the GA leadership


Brant Clifton, the honcho of the Daily Haymaker recently penned an article that fully illustrates how our elected officials operate in the General Assembly, no matter whether they have a D or an R beside their name.   Prepare to be disgusted.

Maserati Timmy’ and his slush fund
Posted on June 11, 2024 by Brant Clifton

Seriously.  WHO is surprised by another story about the tubby little guy from Kings Mountain using taxpayer-funded resources to benefit HIMSELF?  (He’ll fit in sooooo well with those pikers in DC.)

Buckle up, sit back and relax, folks. Here’s ANOTHER ONE:

Hours before House Speaker Tim Moore’s campaign confirmed his plans to run for a congressional seat last fall, he stood before reporters and TV cameras on a patch of land overlooking the interchange of two interstates near Charlotte Douglas International Airport.

Moore announced he had earmarked nearly half of a $100 million discretionary fund to add lanes to the interchange of I-85 and I-485. The funds will help fix a traffic bottleneck in the newly formed congressional district where he is running for a House seat. State officials had ranked the project behind dozens of other pressing transportation needs across the state and weren’t planning to tackle it until 2033. But Moore got it fast-tracked, he said.

“We had the funds, simple as that,” said Moore, a Cleveland County Republican, at the news conference on Nov. 2. “This has been something we’ve been working on here for over a year really, and we finally in this year’s budget had the money to be able to allocate it.” That money wasn’t in his chamber’s budget proposal that passed in April, or the state Senate’s counter proposal approved a month later. The $100 million — an appropriation not tied to specific projects — was tucked inside a 786-page supplement to a 625-page compromise budget bill. It was not made public until Sept. 20, the day before lawmakers voted on it and six weeks before Moore announced the interchange funding. At that point in the budget approval process, no lawmaker could propose changes before the vote.

Democrats who were locked out of the final budget talks had no idea the $100 million had been added, they say. […]

The $100 million is one example of state lawmakers in the past several years adding major spending to state budgets just before they go to a final vote, giving little time for public scrutiny and no opportunity for removal. The budget, which lays out a spending plan for public dollars, is arguably the most significant piece of legislation passed each year. Last year’s budget was just under $30 billion. Technically, lawmakers pass a two-year budget in odd-numbered years, but they adopt substantial budget modifications the next year.

In two of those budget modification years — 2018 and 2022 — North Carolina legislative leaders skipped the public process of developing a budget entirely. They negotiated behind closed doors a final budget that they then rolled out for votes, something veteran observers of state government say they’ve not seen before.

The late, high-dollar spending creates distrust among the public while making it more difficult to root out flawed policies and government waste, open government advocates say. “There should not be spending of public tax dollars that has not been discussed openly, debated openly and available for public comment and response,” said Ann Webb, Common Cause North Carolina’s policy director. […]

The NCDOT contingency fund that Moore pulled the $45 million from has been under a dark cloud since the 1990s. The budget item has long been called a slush fund for the House speaker, Senate leader and the NCDOT secretary — whether they be Democrat or Republican — who traditionally split the money.

Don Carrington, the retired executive director and lead investigative reporter for The Carolina Journal, a conservative John Locke Foundation publication, often wrote about the contingency fund, saying it puts political interests over transportation safety. “It was wrong when I wrote about it,” said Carrington, who retired in 2020. “It’s still wrong now.”

Moore’s spending, as described by an N&O reporter, looks like another example of a “political move,” he said. “If safety is the main concern, then it wouldn’t need a special push from the leader of the House,” Carrington said.

Lawmakers created the fund in the mid-1980s. For decades they deposited roughly $10 million a year, with legislative leaders’ spending often going into favored lawmakers’ districts. That wasn’t the only area where politics were influencing road building.

Some appointees to the N.C. Board of Transportation who were big campaign fundraisers had steered projects near their or their families’ businesses and had to resign after news reports exposed it. In 2009, then Gov. Bev Perdue signed an executive order intended to depoliticize transportation spending.

The order banned board members from voting on individual projects and required DOT experts to develop a data-driven formula to determine where transportation dollars should go. Since then, transportation needs are evaluated, prioritized and placed on the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program’s list of projects for the next 10 years. The list is updated every two years and approved by the transportation board, a process that allows transportation needs that have become more urgent to move up the list. The contingency fund for lawmakers continued, even after Republican and Democratic gubernatorial candidates called for an end to it in 2008.

Lawmakers annually placed roughly $10 million into the fund, including Republicans when they took control in 2011.

GOP House and Senate leaders sought to bump it up to $22.5 million in 2019, budget records show, but Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, vetoed that budget. Two years later, they increased the fund to $62 million in a budget that Cooper signed. But the most dramatic change happened in 2023 with an unknown budget writer inserting $100 million, bringing the account to $112 million.

And unlike past years, lawmakers didn’t give NCDOT Secretary Joey Hopkins a cut of the $100 million, said Jamie Kritzer, an NCDOT spokesman. Cooper let that budget pass without his signature because it included money for the Medicaid expansion he’d sought for years.

Hopkins did not respond to numerous requests for comment through a family member and Kritzer. Cooper appointed him to the job in October after he had served in a variety of NCDOT positions for more than 30 years, including chief operating officer. Senate leader Phil Berger, a Rockingham County Republican, said he didn’t request the $100 million increase and wasn’t sure who did. He agreed to it because the state had a $3 billion surplus last year, and the money was going to projects that had a demonstrated need and NCDOT approval, he said. Kritzer said all the projects require NCDOT approval.

But Moore didn’t wait, announcing it ahead of the board’s December meeting, when it was formally approved, records show. It would upgrade a congested interchange that drivers have complained about for years. Regional and state transportation officials began eyeing it for improvements in 2018. The $45 million Moore committed to the interchange project on the edge of his hoped-for congressional district is by far the largest award from the fund since 2020. It is nearly $38 million more than the next most expensive project: $7.25 million committed to better connect downtown Pembroke to the UNC Pembroke campus and the Lumbee Tribe’s state headquarters.



Moore and his Republican colleagues reconfigured the 14th Congressional District as part of redistricting in October. By the time they were done, much of a previously Democratic-leaning district held by a freshman Democrat, U.S. Rep. Jeff Jackson, was shifted out of Mecklenburg County, adding more Republican voters. Jackson opted to run for state attorney general. The 14th District now incorporates all of Cleveland County, where Moore lives, and stretches west into Polk County. The interchange is a major eastern gateway to the congressional district, which now includes a new casino near Moore’s hometown of Kings Mountain. Moore had done legal work for Skyboat Gaming, a company that had partnered with the Catawba Nation Indian tribe to develop the casino. At the time of his announcement, Moore had serious competition in the Republican primary for the 14th District: Pat Harrigan, a Green Beret and businessman who built up name recognition in 2022 with an unsuccessful bid against Jackson. A month later, Harrigan opted to run for another Republican-leaning district — the 10th — when Rep. Patrick McHenry decided not to seek re-election. […]


Two top budget writers for their respective chambers, Rep. Jason Saine of Lincoln County and state Sen. Ralph Hise of Mitchell County, said they supported adding $100 million to the long controversial DOT fund. Saine said he also supported Moore putting $45 million of it into the Charlotte interchange. “Is it a political decision? Probably,” he said. “Is it an obvious one also because it is a jammed up intersection?”

[…] Berger, like House leaders Saine and Hise, defended the practice of inserting hundreds of millions of dollars in spending into the final budget so close to final votes. “There’s a lot that goes into putting a budget together,” Berger said. “Every bit of it is not supported by every member that voted for it. But when you are deciding to vote or not support I think you’ve got to balance whether or not overall if there’s more good than questionable.” There used to be more guardrails on this state’s budgeting process. In resolutions legislators passed each session from the late 1980s to 2003, both chambers agreed to limit what could be included in the final version of compromise budget bills — known as conference reports — to what had first appeared in either chamber’s versions. For years it was standard for lawmakers to develop budget bills with a more open process involving subcommittees and hearings in those subcommittees. That openness sometimes exposed wasteful spending and worse. […]  

Lawmakers dropped it as the budget was heard in the House Appropriations Committee. The Democrat-led Senate began adding wiggle room to the rule prohibiting big changes to the budget bill in 2003, saying matters that were “germane” to what had been passed in the House or Senate could be considered. But the House stuck to the original rule until 2011, after Republicans took control of the General Assembly.

It’s a rule lawmakers ought to return to and codify, said Ran Coble, the retired executive director of the nonpartisan N.C. Center for Public Policy Research, which closed in 2021. It served as a watchdog over the legislature.

“This would protect rank-and-file legislators from last-minute surprises that can’t be easily untied from the budget items and other measures that had already been agreed on,” Coble said. Coble said Republican leaders have backslid on budget transparency since gaining control of the legislature for the first time since Reconstruction. Budget bills have swelled, with those in 2021 and 2023 exceeding 600 pages. An N&O review of budgets going back to 2001 shows only two others exceeded 400 pages, in 2015 and 2017. “It’s natural that when party control changes, the party that’s been out of control for a long time wants to enjoy the results of being in control,” Coble said. “I don’t fault them for that, but the changes away from that relatively fair process are a loss.” […]

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )


( June 19th, 2024 @ 5:44 pm )
Not only is Q nuts and an obvious sugar coated turd; it's also what 3/4's of the GOP are subconsciously going along with. Trump's definitely pushing the live footage from October of 2020 when he came to the Airport.

In certain feeds, the news outlets cut the crowd mics off because some dudes behind Trump speaking were slipping in some buzzwords they didn't like
( June 19th, 2024 @ 5:13 pm )
Our system did not meet international best practices of election integrity on a number of issues prior to 2020, but in that election cycle, the Democrats systematically trashed many of the safeguards we did have. There have been some improvements since, but a lot more needs to be done to get back to the standards we had before 2020. One such improvement made in many states but not all is to ban ideological organizations like Zuckerbergs from inserted their people into boards of elections that are supposed to be impartial.

It is not about who wins. It is about processes that are fair, honest, and transparent to secure election integrity. Jimmy Carter understood that and worked in his election processes commission toward such a syste,, but today's Democrats care only about power and how to rig the system to get and keep it.
Big Bob said:
( June 19th, 2024 @ 3:16 pm )
SP- if you cant win an election under our system, you didn't win.

Will - Q is just plain nuts. Have a nice day.
( June 19th, 2024 @ 10:33 am )
Wrong, Bob. In recent years, at least, almost all of the election fraud has been by Democrats. THe 2020 election saw lots of things done by the Democrats that tainted the election outcome, although none of them were properly investigated to get to the truth. That was all swept under the rug.

American standards of elections have failed to follow international best practices in multiple respects because the Democrats strenuously oppose those international best practices. Marc Elias ran the Democrat operation in 2020 to severely weaken safeguards on election integrity and used Covid as his excuse to do it.

Yes, I am sure you will point to the Dowless ballot harvesting operation in Bladen County in a Congressional race several years ago as a Republican election fraud, but illegal ballot harvesting has been a Democrat cottage industry in several southeastern NC counties for many years. Dowless got his training working for the Democrats in that election fraud and in one election sold his skills to one GOP candidate who foolishly accepted his "help". The fact of the matter was that in the very same election, the Democrats did much more illegal ballot harvesting in that part of the state than Dowless, but the Democrat controlled state board of elections did not want to hear about it. An investigative reporter for WBTV in Charlotte, one of the few who still do real journalism, investigated the ballot harvesting in that election and reported that Democrat did a whole lot more of it than the one operative who worked for a Republican campaign. Dowless did his thing in only Bladen County, but Democrat ballot harvesters were also active there. There was also widespread Democrat ballot harvesting in Robeson and Columbus counties. Indeed, Robeson, the largest of the counties seems to have more ballot harvesting than the other two combined and it was all for the Democrats there.
( June 19th, 2024 @ 9:53 am )
JV- kind of sounds like a “beast system” to me.
( June 19th, 2024 @ 4:45 am )
Cousin Simmons,

What you shared with me, in regards to the Petrodollar, is a topic I've addressed in strategic circles only to be laughed at and called a "QAnon" by Conservatives and even the Ultra (MK-ULTRA) MAGA crowd, if you can believe it😎.

To make a long story short; yes, it's highly possible that the Petrodollar has expired and a new standard currency will be brought it. It's also highly possible that the US will coincidentally develop what becomes the new world standard.....when the 'lluminati puts ol' Unca Donnie back in, ironically.

The only way this would be possible if Trump announced that the US is actually a part of BRICS and has been for longer than most know.....since at least 2017.

This is when a global gold standard would be implemented. I find a "global gold standard" to be both an obvious joke and something quite alarming for several reasons. The Q crowd has made this operation out to be a great thing but it's actually a "global" military exercise of control.
( June 19th, 2024 @ 4:46 am )
Cousin Simmons,

What you shared with me, in regards to the Petrodollar, is a topic I've addressed in strategic circles only to be laughed at and called a "QAnon" by Conservatives and even the Ultra (MK-ULTRA) MAGA crowd, if you can believe it😎.

To make a long story short; yes, it's highly possible that the Petrodollar has expired and a new standard currency will be brought in. It's also highly possible that the US will coincidentally develop what becomes the new world standard.....when the 'lluminati puts ol' Unca Donnie back in, ironically.

The only way this would be possible if Trump announced that the US is actually a part of BRICS and has been for longer than most know.....since at least 2017.

This is when a global gold standard would be implemented. I find a "global gold standard" to be both an obvious joke and something quite alarming for several reasons. The Q crowd has made this operation out to be a great thing but it's actually a "global" military exercise of control.
Big Bob said:
( June 18th, 2024 @ 9:00 pm )
I could post as many examples on the right, some right here in NC. Statistically speaking you never have a perfect election but our system is the best and the people's will is heard.

You can expect democrats and republicans to win almost equally
( June 18th, 2024 @ 7:58 pm )
Mr. Valley,

When one sees foreign relations with the Saudis, one thinks of oil, OPEC, and the petrodollar. Which is what we have, a dollar only worth anything because other countries must use it to buy and sell oil.

But what if they didn’t? What would happen if they sent all those dollars back because they were trading in some other currency?
( June 18th, 2024 @ 7:54 pm )
A few weeks ago there were some Democrat officials in New England indicted for election fraud. This week a judicial race was ordered re-run in the liberal enclave of Houston in Texas after 1,400 illegal votes were cast. Democrat election fraud happens.
( June 18th, 2024 @ 6:50 pm )
THe facts are that Trump and Republicans strenuously objected to these distortions of the election statutes and in some cases Constitutional provisions by the Marc Elias sue and settle cases at the time they were being done, BEFORE the election. Republicans are still active trying to force Democrats to follow the election law. Just last week a state court in Michigan, for example ruled for Republicans and ordered Michigan's Democrat Secretary of State to direct local officials to verify the signatures on mail-in ballots and applications after she had, in clear violation of state election law, told them to just presume the signatures were valid.

The rat hole is the one the Democrats have sent our election process down, and we need to get it back out of that rat hole. According to the polling, a majority of voters realize we have some serious provlems with our election system and are concerned about the upcoming election.
Big Bob said:
( June 18th, 2024 @ 5:39 pm )
SR- go down that rat hole all you want. My hope is that most Americans see it for what it is.

Self serving. If Trump had won, not a word from most of you. Why you would support that orange fathead destroy this country is beyond me.
View All Comments

2 tier justice system - Garland stonewalls contempt of Congress prosecution Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Supreme Court makes it easier to deport illegal aliens


Back to Top