Comments by Stan Deatherage | Eastern NC Now

But you're not. Your previous comments on this very post belies that fact.

Commented: Friday, June 5th, 2015 @ 2:49 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Wow, that is a very inclusive summation.

Commented: Friday, June 5th, 2015 @ 2:14 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Same old "'HATE' Speech" from Gene.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 3:13 pm By: Stan Deatherage

It is still just "'HATE' Speech" to me.

Google Browser Find Tool: Ctrl + F, put hate in drop down box. You have to do it when looking at the HTML code.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 2:10 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Damn, Bobby Tony. That's a bingo.

That is why I only accuse people of the obvious. No one other than my wife, and, on occasion, my children knows what goes on in my heart.

Only she has paid the price to know these things.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 10:57 am By: Stan Deatherage

You accuse me of 'HATE', while much wiser people than you accuse me of 'Smart'. I'll stick with the smart.

I could never understand your "'HATE' Speech" anyway.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 10:03 am By: Stan Deatherage

Gene, you are a Liberal. Therefore, you don't understand what is currently happening, but even though you do not realize the obvious, it does not make it any less significant.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 9:43 am By: Stan Deatherage

For you Liberals, at least when you surrender, as President Surrender Monkey did, there should be plenty of American made weaponry to destroy, as targets, before that surrendered weaponry kills too many more innocent people.

Actually, that's not working either since the air campaign is more than 50% ineffective since there is no one on the ground directing it.

Democrats surrender, lose wars, but they can sure hand out the freebies to buy votes from their low information electorate.

Oh, yeah, and they can whine.

Commented: Thursday, June 4th, 2015 @ 4:48 am By: Stan Deatherage

America's Surrender Monkey - Barack the Bad - has now enacted foreign policy, where we are fighting an air war against an enemy that Liberals cower from, and where we are spending over 9 million dollars a day to destroy American hardware - 40 M1 Abrams, 2300 Humvees, etc., etc., - all surrendered, by proxy, by the Iraqi cowards that the Liberals' president considers worthy warriors.

Either Barack Hussein is an idiot or a coward. I vote both.

What have we learned from this? Democrats lose wars, especially the really popular elected Democrats with America's Liberals.

Commented: Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015 @ 10:46 pm By: Stan Deatherage

My word: Who designed that icon (not that there is anything wrong with that)?

Commented: Tuesday, June 2nd, 2015 @ 9:56 am By: Stan Deatherage

Thanks.

Now I have to find time to sell it.

Commented: Tuesday, June 2nd, 2015 @ 6:17 am By: Stan Deatherage

"Agree to Disagree": What a cliche?

One man's name calling is another man's perfect descriptor. I would think you should know that, as often as you use descriptors of the Liberal variety on a very regular basis to make your various points about Conservatives and the SBC.

Using descriptors to pigeonhole their opposition is a Liberal staple of argument. Furthermore, if Liberals can not accurately fit their opposition into some stereo type, they lie, create straw man arguments, and incessantly speak in cliches, throwing around nonsensical jargon that low information Americans better understand.

These words/phrases have long been mindlessly, and thoroughly trashed by Liberals, not unlike other words and phrases, such as: racist, gay, progressive, diversity, empowerment, neanderthal, mean-spirited, social justice, 1%, Koch Brothers, stakeholders, Rush Limbaugh, Faux News, Hate, name-calling, Bush/Cheney, bigot, Conservative, torture, moral equivalency, bipartisanship (or do it our way), etc. ... until I can add more, and I will do so, as long as there is Liberal speak.

When you snidely call me a Conservative, I consider the descriptor a badge of honor, irrespective of your intentions.

I have no problem being considered in the same light as Ronald Reagan, Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and now a Ted Cruz.

So 'name-call' to your heart's content, and I will continue to use the perfect descriptors that I am familiar with, that work so well, until I come up other, better descriptors, and I will because I have.

Commented: Monday, June 1st, 2015 @ 12:13 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Your insinuation that: "We BOTH know you have a vested interest in your building adjacent to the current jail and Courthouse" would not preclude Hood from voting since he has no vested direct interest - especially if he votes as he said he would, and votes against any jail, anywhere. The real world does not run within the failed precepts of the Liberal mind.

To suggest that there is a conflict of 'interest' strains incredulity.

I have refuted that continued slander against Hood in BCN, by Liberals and RINOs (no difference), and I will continue to do everything I can to refute this and any other slander here against anyone, when I know the truth to be otherwise.

beaufortcountynow.com

Gene, I know you have some Simple minded friends, as per some of your expression of the group analysis of issues that you/they won't take the trouble to understand, and these individuals would be wise to think twice before they wag their simple tongues to intentionally damage others.

I consider this warning a great kindness.

Commented: Monday, June 1st, 2015 @ 8:36 am By: Stan Deatherage

Gene,

The building fantasy is a blatant liberal lie that you, obviously, discuss with you liberal friends that don't have enough brain power to negotiate real issues - that's why they lie.

My advice is that at some point even Liberals, who truly don't have much in the way of cognitive abilities, may still be liable for slander, even though Hood is a public official.

Be careful. The condition of Liberal will not always absolve one from heinous slander charges, irrespective of how stupid the Liberal may be, or even how well connected the Stupid may assume that he/she is.

What if Hood tires of the lies, maybe is no longer an elected official (the burden of proof drops exponentially for the plaintiff), and he sues the Hell out of you, Liberals, just for the fun of it, and wins a huge punitive settlement because he proves malice of forethought.

For my part, now that I am no longer a public official, I personally no longer tolerate slander, and I would seek remedy if I had a good enough case, and could take enough from that individual to make it worth my while. I'm that fed up with liars, and that fed up with the Stupids who lie. Hood could become that guy, and you, Liberals, need not temp the anger of a righteous man. It could get biblical here.

My advice: Just because stupid, dishonest people say things often enough with the firm intent to damage others, it doesn't make it right, and repeating known lies is a very dangerous game, even for you Liberals.

Be careful.

Commented: Monday, June 1st, 2015 @ 12:03 am By: Stan Deatherage

I'm all for that. Now to get Gene on board. We already have Bobby Tony.

Commented: Sunday, May 31st, 2015 @ 5:56 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Yeah: Phew.

Commented: Sunday, May 31st, 2015 @ 5:30 pm By: Stan Deatherage

Does Gene know Bob Uecker? He wasn't a poor Baptist was he?

Commented: Sunday, May 31st, 2015 @ 5:23 pm By: Stan Deatherage