Here's An Idea for the Wall | Eastern North Carolina Now

Home
Categories
Login
Advertisement
VbAD0
Latest Polls   (view all)
Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?
98.85% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.
1.15% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.
0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?
Latest Comments   (view all)
Advertisement
VbAD1
Video Productions   (view all)
WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW
with Stan Deatherage
Commissioner Hood Richardson
Better Governing Practices
Latest Entries   (view all)
Advertisement
O2bAD0
ENCN Masthead
ENCN Masthead
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments
( January 28th, 2018 @ 10:22 am )
 
Exaggeration is actually protected under the First Amendment. I could not include this link in first comment due to BCN restrictions of one link per comment.

"Under the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New York, No. 79-565, Supreme Court of the United States, 447 U.S. 557; 100 S. Ct. 2343; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 48; 65 L. Ed. 2d 341; 6 Media L. Rep. 1497; 34 P.U.R.4th 178, June 20, 1980, a state must justify restrictions on truthful, nonmisleading commercial speech by demonstrating that its actions "directly advance" a substantial state interest and are no more extensive than necessary to serve that interest. This is the so-called Central Hudson Test."

www.lawpublish.com
( January 28th, 2018 @ 10:12 am )
 
With all due respect to "Pink Floyd" I offer this tidbit.

I have no doubt that very few people will compare Donald Trump to Thomas Jefferson, but I have a feeling that he knew what he was talking about when he said he was going to build a wall. Many of both sides of the aisle have taken him literally and forgotten that he is a salesman and deal-maker first and often talks in exaggeration, hyperbole, overstatement. One of the first rules of sales is to sell the sizzle and not the steak. Perhaps the Liberals should adopt the same position that they use to regularly beat the rest of us over the head with regarding Religion..

"The Wall of Separation" explained as used by Thomas Jefferson

www.loc.gov
( January 28th, 2018 @ 12:50 am )
 
"All in all, it's just another brick in the wall".



Our Modern-Day Interposer, Judge Roy Moore Diane's Rants, Local News & Expression, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics The SNI Plan; an Evolving Entity, a Leading Edge Product


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country
populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD1

Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top