We Might Be Witnessing a Cultural Revolution | Eastern NC Now

David Harsanyi used his latest National Review Online column to welcome readers to America’s version of the Chinese “cultural revolution.”

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    David Harsanyi used his latest National Review Online column to welcome readers to America's version of the Chinese "cultural revolution."

  • We're in the dawn of a high-tech, bloodless Cultural Revolution; one that relies on intimidation, public shaming, and economic ruin to dictate what words and ideas are permissible in the public square.
  • "Words are violence" has always been an illiberal notion meant to stifle speech and open discourse. Popularized by a generation of coddled and brittle college students, it now guides policy on editorial pages at newspapers such as the Philadelphia Inquirer, the New York Times, and most major news outlets.
  • The Times can claim that a harsh tone and a small factual error in Senator Tom Cotton's recent op-ed was the reason the entire paper had a meltdown, but the staffers who revolted initially claimed that Cotton's argument for bringing the National Guard into cities put black lives in "danger."
  • Cotton's critics are correct that not every dumb or radical idea deserves a debate or a place in the country's biggest newspapers - although some of us believe editors should make room for contrarian and unpopular arguments. But this insistence masks their real objection: That Cotton's column, which tonally and philosophically was well within the parameters of traditional editorial writing, might have found an audience. At root, our cultural revolutionaries are frightened of ideas. Do we honestly believe that had another paper published it, the same people wouldn't have deemed that inappropriate, too?
  • None of the Times' editors, all of whom are apparently comfortable with running fabulist histories or odes to Communist tyrannies, pushed back against the caustic notion that engaging in debate was act of violence. They bowed to the internal mob and pleaded for forgiveness.
  • What editor at a major newspaper is going to stand up for ideals of open and free debate if doing so means putting "black lives in danger" and ends his career? Few, if any.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




What Is “Guidance? Nothing More Than a Rule in Disguise John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics State Education Officials Issue Recommendations, No Mandates


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.
Not giving our kids their own devices was one of the best parenting decisions my husband and I made.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top