Analyzing Supreme Court Decisions on Religious Schools

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

91.07% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

8.04% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.89% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
112 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Analyzing Supreme Court Decisions on Religious Schools

Published: Tuesday, July 21st, 2020 @ 10:55 am
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

Dan McLaughlin reports for National Review Online on the U.S. Supreme Court's consistent approach to cases involving religious schools.

The Supreme Court's decisions in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru offered a one-two punch of victories for religious schools under the religion clauses of the First Amendment. Espinoza, a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, protected the right of parents to use taxpayer-funded school choice for religious schools on the same basis as non-religious schools. Guadalupe, a 7-2 decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, protected the right of religious schools to control the hiring and firing of their religious teachers without interference from laws that govern teachers at non-religious schools.
Some critics see a contradiction. As one Above the Law columnist argued, "no sane reading of our religious liberty clauses supports the notion that government is both commanded to stay out of the affairs of religious schools while at the same time existing under the obligation to fund them." In fact, what the two cases do is preserve a space for the free exercise of religion that actually takes religion seriously. ... [T]he Court's view is both philosophically consistent and firmly grounded in the history of the First Amendment.
The liberal-progressive view sounds, at first glance, sensible enough: In the public, government-funded sector, everything religious must be subordinated to avoid an establishment of religion or the large-scale obstruction of civil law; on your own time and your own dime, you can practice your faith. But there are ... problems with this framework.
The first problem is religious: It is not enough simply to tell religious believers that they can participate in the government-funded sector in a non-religious way, and then just practice their faith on their own time. That's just not how faith works.

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Trump Team Splits Over Big Rallies

John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics

Captain America Actor to Send 6-Year-Old ‘Hero’ Gift After He Defended Younger Sister From Dog Attack

Our Members

ENCN Sign Up

BCN Home

Beaufort Observer

Portfolios

Current Events: A Historical Perspective

Current Weather

Latest Comments

Latest Polls

Featured Entries

Latest Entries

Analyzing Supreme Court Decisions on Religious Schools | Eastern NC Now

Analyzing Supreme Court Decisions on Religious Schools

Leave a Guest Comment

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Tulsi Gabbard releases documents on US funded gain of function research at foreign labs

CEO of major Democrat funding group ActBlue pleads the 5th on election finance frauds

Creative new term limits bill introduced by Congressman Chip Roy with 12 year limit

What is the nuclear family and its significance in society?

The British police state: bill to jail tech CEOs who refuse to spy on everyone's cell phone

White House Doctor Announces Results Of Trump’s Annual Physical

Riots sweep Belfast after African migrant attempts to behead a local man in random attack

Illegal alien migrants behaving badly - migrants and crime NEWLY UPDATED

The JAIL Act: cracking down on soft-on-crime judges

new report: Minnesota Dems knew about mass Somali fraud but refused to do anything about it

Investigative reporter Nick Shirley finds 126 year old California voter,

UK top Labour leader says all ethnic groups should NOT be treated the same by police

EXCLUSIVE: State Department Organizing Global Push Against Far-Left Terror

Obama judge opens US immigration to migrants from 38 terrorist infected countries

Will California's crooked election system produce crooked results this year? Fed probe launched

It was my war

The ‘90s Childhood Comeback

A Pro-Life Cause Deserves a Prudent Strategy

"woke" New York replaces "mother" in state law with "gestating parent" & other nonsense

RINO Thom Tillis betrays Americans and GOP in voting AGAINST election integrity law

part of Spanberger gun law smacked down by Virginia judge

It gets worse on Southern Poverty Law Center funding KKK and Nazis with donor money

Making America Booming With Babies

Democrats nominate increasingly radical candidates for Congress in safe Dem seats

Number of Virginia DA's refusing to enforce Spanberger gun law rises to thirteen

"White Lives Matter" - Nigel Farage blasts police conduct in murder of white Brit by a migrant

America Waves Goodbye To Stephen Colbert As Trump Lands A Final Parting Shot