Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued the following statement in response to the United States Supreme Court's refusal to grant cert to Judicial Watch's challenge
to an appeals court decision exempting Hillary Clinton from testifying under oath about her emails and Benghazi attack documents:
- Hillary Clinton ignored the law but received special protection from both the courts and law enforcement. For countless Americans, this double standard of justice has destroyed confidence in the fair administration of justice. Americans would never have known about Hillary Clinton's email and related pay for play scandals but for Judicial Watch's diligence. We expect that the Biden State and Justice Departments will continue to protect her and cover up their own misconduct as we press for additional accountability through the courts.
Judicial Watch argued that the Supreme Court should hear its case because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in undermining the Freedom of Information Act in giving Clinton unwarranted special treatment that conflicts both with Supreme Court precedent and the precedents of other courts of appeal, including its own.
The cert petition arose from the Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
(Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State
(No. 1:14-cv-01242), which led directly
to the disclosure of Clinton's use of a nongovernment email server to conduct government business. On March 2, 2020, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth authorized
Judicial Watch to depose Clinton about her emails and the existence of relevant Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered
the deposition of Clinton's former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, and two other State Department officials.