Fox News Slammed Over ‘Insane’ Restrictions For Covering Presidential Debate: ‘Totally Crazy’ | Eastern NC Now

Legacy cable news channel Fox News has reportedly informed news organizations and media figures that they will severely limit how much content from the Republican Party primary debate they will be able to show their audiences or else they could face potential legal action.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ryan Saavedra.

    Legacy cable news channel Fox News has reportedly informed news organizations and media figures that they will severely limit how much content from the Republican Party primary debate they will be able to show their audiences or else they could face potential legal action.

    Ben Shapiro - the founding editor-in-chief and editor emeritus of The Daily Wire and host of "The Ben Shapiro Show," the top conservative podcast in the nation - noted that Fox News sent out a memo saying that during the seven day period following the debate, no media outlet can air more than a total of three minutes of excerpts from the debate in any one program, including video and audio.

    "They're out of their minds. That's totally crazy," Shapiro said. "They're treating this like a football game or like a baseball game, which is nuts. Okay, that's nuts. This is newsworthy material involving the presidential candidates, the people who are going to represent you at the top levels of American government. And Fox News is saying that you're not allowed to hear from them unless you watch the debate live, or unless you're watching Fox News. That's totally crazy."

    "It means that when people like me recap the debate, and explain to you what happened in the debate last night, Fox News is now threatening to sue people like me if I play you four minutes of the debate tomorrow, despite the fact that my show would bring them an extraordinary number of people who are viewers and listeners," he continued. "Like, how the hell is anybody supposed to actually figure out what happened in debate unless they watched the thing live? I understand they're now trying to telescope all viewership on Fox News to the debate itself. But good luck with this. I mean, just really ridiculous, ridiculous stuff."

    Shapiro said that Fox News was trying to "grip harder and harder to it's declining user base," but the information they are trying to restrict "should be relevant information like fair use, like classic fair use kind of stuff for conservatives all over the country."

HbAD0

    "For Fox to restrict access to your ability to listen to clips of the debate with commentary, which is the normal way that Fair Use works, threatening litigation against everybody else, is pretty insane," he added.


    Some notable responses included:


Go Back

HbAD1

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD2

On Monday, US Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC11, was found in violation of the House Code of Official Conduct by the House Ethics Committee, regarding the prohibition of sexual harassment, resulting in calls for him to be censured.
The new program will teach students how to "become an influencer and strategic storyteller who thrives in the rapidly evolving creator economy."
Republicans have consistently backed the blue and new data shows President Trump's strong leadership has led to the fastest decline in violent crime in modern American history.
Sanctuary county for the unborn resolution to be presented by Stan Deatherage at tonight’s (Monday August 3) Beaufort County commissioner meeting.
Biden autopen pardon does not protect him against state prosecution

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top