Comments by Steven P. Rader | Eastern NC Now

Browse all Comments by Steven P. Rader...

ENCNow

Comments by Steven P. Rader

Growth????? The massive forced bussing ordered by Judge McMillan was a losing situation for everybody. The students bussed out from the predominantly black high schools to majority white high schools did not want to go, the blacks already there were caught in tricky, delicate, and uncomfortable situations due to resentments from the blacks being bussed in. For whites there was a lot of chaos that disrupted education.

These problems persisted beyond that first year. The very next year, the first white student walkout occured at South Mecklenburg. A white girl whose class was in the school library asked to go to the restroom and did. When she walked in, there were some of the Second Ward black girls in there cutting class and they jumped her, holding her down and beating her while she called for help. A student government officer was walking down the hall toward the principal's office, heard the cry for help, and went in and rescued her. The only student disciplined was the white boy who rescued the girl, who was suspended for going in a girl's restroom (different era, I guess!). The next day there was a student walkout and protest, which most white students and many of the rural blacks as well, from what I was told, participated in. Unfortunately, my high school German teacher, Mr. Idol, got fired over that. He had gone out for a pizza the evening before the walkout, and there were a bunch of students in the pizza place talking about the incident and what to do about it. Mr. Idol had agreed it was wrong to suspend the rescuer and not the assailants and suggested a petition to take to the school board. Apparently that was enough for the principal to blame him for the walkout and protest.

A couple of years later, bussing was still festering as an issue in the Mecklenburg County schools. When a bussing dispute arose in Boston, somebody got an idea to bring some students up from those schools to tell Boston that bussing was okay, and did so. This infuriated many other students who still were upset over bussing, and the next day, anti-bussing demonstrations broke out at all of the high schools and some of the junior highs in Mecklenburg County, and from the news footage I watched, there were both white and black students participating in those protests.

Judge McMillan paid a personal price for his radical social engineering court order. He was a member of the Myers Park Country Club, the most elite upscale country club in the county. My brother's girlfriend's family were also members so I heard the impact there. After McMillan's order, the rest of the members gave him the silent treatment, refusing to talk to him. He would try to talk to people he had known for years and they just ignored him like he was not there. He stayed away months, apparently hoping it would blow over but it did not. When he went back, he was still given the silent treatment. His ruling made him a pariah in the community.

Bob, you use the term "growth" and that might be an appropriate term if you used it in the sense of a "growth" that is discovered on a liver, kidney, or other vital organ. Bussing severely damaged the educational experience of all races. It is a very distinct issue from integration, something that was positive for education.
Commented: Monday, December 11th, 2023 @ 10:50 am By: Steven P. Rader
Bob, you fully qualify for what Margaret Thatcher called the "loony left", always keen on the agenda and the narrative no matter who it hurts.

The 70/30 court order and social experiment from Judge McMillan on Mecklenburg County Schools was a negative to everyone in the school system. The ones I felt sorry fot the most were the rural blacks who had been happy at our high school and felt a part of it. When the inner city students from Second Ward High School were bussed in, bringing with them a huge amount of bitterness over the closing of their own school, and not wanting to be at South Mecklenburg, they particularly resented the rural black students already there who fit in. The bitterness of those Second Ward students also made their own experience quite a negative one.

White students, unless they happened to be on the receiving end of one of the assaults, had significant but lesser negative impacts than those two groups of black students. We had to endure the racial demonstrations / riors / walkovts and bomb threats that disrupted everyone's education, and the loss of our school traditions and senior priveleges due to an administration paranoid that anything would create more racial division. But as a group, those rural black students, who were walking on eggshells due to the resentment of the Second Ward black students who had it worst. The Second Ward students did not get over their bitterness at being there the whole year and that marred their own experience.

One example of the rural black students feeling the hear was that in my first two years at SouthMeck, the football players, black and white had their own area in the New Cafeteria where they ate lunch together. This was not anyting official, just that as team mates they liked to eat together. After bussing, the black football players, all from the group of rural blacks, stopped eating with their white team mates because they wanted to avoid friction from the Second Ward students.

They still had a commaderie but were afraid to show it too publicly. However, when my best friend in high school, Mike, got jumped by a group of Second Ward students early one school day, it was a group of rural blacks, led by one of his football teammates who rescued him.

From personal experience that first year of Judge McMillan's readical busssing order, it was clear that nobody's educational situation was improved, and indeed quite the opposite. If they had bothered to consult the actual students who had to live under that order, they would have heard from both the blacks and the whites that it was a very bad idea.
Commented: Saturday, December 9th, 2023 @ 5:35 pm By: Steven P. Rader
I was one of the guinea pigs on your sides social experiment on massive forced bussing, Bob. The school system I attended was the defendant in that lawsuit and it brought chaos to my senior year in high school as we were the first impacted. Judge James McMillan broke with previous law with a radical new ruling.

When I started at South Mecklenburg High School in 1968, we had a black community in Pineville, NC and a number of rural black communities in our attendance zone, and they made up a bit under 15% of the student body. Black and white students got along well and we had no problems.

McMillan's ruling required all schools countywide to have an arbitrary ratio of 70% white and 30% black. South Mecklenburg lost a few of the black communities in rural areas that had attended the school, and had a massive influx of students from the Second Ward High School in central Charlotte, which was closed and the students bussed a long distance to our school (and some bussed to other high schools).

The students from Second Ward did not want to be at South Mecklenburg. When our coaches tried to recruit their top athletes for our teams, most of them refused to play for SouthMeck. There was a well organizaed "student government in exile" among the Second Ward students who demanded their high school be reinstated and themselves returned there. A number of prominent black businessmen and professionals who had been involved in Second Ward's alumni organization publicly quit the NAACP blaming them as the lawsuit plaintiffs for the loss of their school.

At the other predominantly black high school, West Charlotte HS, which remained open, there was an assembly held to tell students where they would be bussed to the following school year. The students responded with loud boos and walked out of the assembly in protest. The radical activist Judge McMillan never bothered to ask actual black students where they wanted to go to school.

My senior year, when the forced bussing came in, was absolute chaos. Bomb threats, race riots, racial assaults, and similar problems were a common occurence, things that never happened my first two years of high school. The blacks who had been going to SouthMeck and those bussed in from Second Ward were constantly at loggerheads, and sometimes physical fights broke out between the groups. Those bussed in, who did not want to be there, resented those who felt at home at SouthMeck.

Serving on the Interclub Council, my junior and senior years, all of our clubs saw a big falloff in participation. While the blacks from Pineville and the rural areas still participated, there was almost no participation from the newcomers from Second Ward. Part of that may have been their long distances to home made afterschool activities impractical, but part of it was they did not feel a part of our school and resented being sent there.

Race relations took a huge nosedive from Judge McMillan's radical social experiment. I particularly felt sorry for the black students who had been part of our school before bussing being treated so badly by the Second Ward newcomers.

And, Bob, our schools were in full compliance with what the law was prior to McMillan's radical ruling, but he changed the law on us and everyone else.
Commented: Friday, December 8th, 2023 @ 10:53 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Bubba, it is quite common for there to be credible arguments on both sides of a legal question. In government, policy differences and issues of power and control between various levels of government are often dealt with as legal issues, and can often be argued from either side. That is why it is important in a government office to have attorneys who are on the same policy wavelength as the elected decision makers.

I served as General Counsel of the largest department of NC state government in the Jim Martin administration. At the end of administration, with an incoming Democrat administration, the new Democrat governor removed every departmental general counsel in state government, because we were all Republicans, even though in most cases they did not have a new appointee ready to fill the offices.

Another example is the relationship between attorneys for the Martin administration and the Democrat Attorney General. We often took different legal positions based on policy differences. Indeed, Governor Martin's Chief Counsel sent out a memo stressing that no agency in the administration should request an Attorney General opinion on any significant matter of policy but should issue our own departmental legal opinions instead. Three times, when lower agencies within our department unilaterally submitted something for an AG opinion, I had to write departmental opinions taking the opposite legal position. All three times those conflicting legal opinions were reviewed by higher authorities, and each time our departmental legal opinion prevailed over the AG opinion.

There are lots of conflicts in the law, caused by such things as differing statutes, differing opinions of the meaning of statutes, interpretations of appellate court decisions, and the like. Sometimes the law is very clear cut with no wiggle room, but very often, statutes and court decisions have have widely varying interpretations.

When it comes to public schools, DPI wants to control as much as they can, and sometimes is overbearing in its overreach. I remember 40 years ago, when a fellow member of the old Pitt-Beaufort Conservative Union, who was a conservative Democrat and served as school board attorney in Pitt County commented at one of our meetings about how the best way to deal with DPI's demands that local schools do or not do something was to challenge their legal authority to make the demand. Very often they did not have the authority they asserted, and they backed down. Indeed, quite often they did not even respond to his challenge to their authority and the local schools just kept doing things the way they wanted. Having a local school board attorney who is willing to stand up to DPI and assert the local school board's position is something every school board should do because the law is often not as clear cut as DPI would like.
Commented: Friday, December 1st, 2023 @ 9:23 pm By: Steven P. Rader
A current school board member gave me some insight on how the current out of town school board attorney came to represent the school system. During the Covid era some issues arose between the last local attorney to serve as school board attorney and Superintendant Cheeseman, and also between that attorney and at least one board member. Ultimately, she resigned to take another position.

While in Perquimans County, Cheeseman had used the attorney who represents school boards in lawsuits over a million dollars to serve as the general local school board attorney as well. Each local school board pays into a trust run by the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) that handles such major lawsuits, and this attorney handles cases for that trust. Cheeseman suggested bringing him in as Beaufort County School Board attorney for routine legal matters, like he had done in Perquimans County rather than retaining another local attorney, and the school board agreed.

Using an attorney with such a close relationship with DPI is a two edged sword. On matters where there is a minor disagreement, his relationships may help positively resolve them for the local board. However, in more major disagreements that cannot be so easily settled, it puts such an attorney in a very awkward position caught between a relatively minor client, and another who is a gatekeeper of his bread and butter.
Commented: Thursday, November 30th, 2023 @ 9:22 pm By: Steven P. Rader
I was a member of the Electoral College from North Carolina in that election, and the Gore people got our email addresses and flooded our email accounts with emails demanding we violate state law and vote for Gore instead of Bush. The Trump people never stooped that low. In Florida, the Gore people kept trying to steal enough votes in the recount to steal the state for their candidate. The Gore people tried a lot of shady things, but it did not pay off for them.

Who wins or loses has nothing to do with whether an election is fraudulent. What makes an election fraudulent is that someone cheats and cheats enough to change the outcome.
Commented: Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 @ 6:50 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Normally the courts are who would investigate election results. In some countries in Europe, it is automatic that a top court such as the Constitutional Court reviews and approves the election results before they become official. In Grazil, it is the military high command. In others, the courts only become involved if there is a challenge, as has happened in recent elections in London and Berlin. In London, only one district had evidence of irregulatities, so the election was re-run only in that district by court order. In Berlin, the Constitutional Court ordered the entire election re-run. American courts have regretably been overly gunshy about getting involved in election challenges. Those things should be investigated and the challenge proven either right or wrong, not left to fester with no investigation.
Commented: Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 @ 2:43 pm By: Steven P. Rader
From Bob's superficial comments, it is clear that he has never been an official election observer. Personally, I have been certified by foreign election authorities as an International Election Observer in seven foreign elections, both short term (election day) and long term (entire campaign period). Just from media accounts, in the 2020 US election, there were a huge number of red flags indicative of electoin malpractice, and these began with manipulation of election procedures by Democrat attorneys, often in direct collusion with Democrat state election officials, to make election cheating easier. There were a whole lot of red flags on election day and even more so with the vote count, as well. Almost none of these were properly investigated. At best the 2020 election process was highly suspicious. If I were preparing an election observation report on it, I would note the red flags and conclude that further investigation of those red flags was necessary to determine if it was free and fair or not.
Commented: Wednesday, November 29th, 2023 @ 6:51 am By: Steven P. Rader
I lived for two years under a Communist Party government in eastern Europe where there was a lot more freedom of speech than this thug Varadkar wants to give the Irish people.
Commented: Tuesday, November 28th, 2023 @ 10:45 am By: Steven P. Rader
Polling shows that opposition to illegal immigration is one of the most potent issues Republicans have against Democrats in 2024. Elections in Europe also shows it works very well against the left. Why in the world is Tillis trying to throw this away for the GOP? Whose side is he on?
Commented: Thursday, November 23rd, 2023 @ 4:27 pm By: Steven P. Rader
There is a lesson in that Dutch election for some wimpy GOP politicians who want to wimp out on the immigration issue, and that same lesson is also there in many other recent European elections. Those like Thom Tillis who always go soft on this issue threaten one of the key issues Republicans have that will push us to victory in 2024.

I read that some think it will be bumpy in the Dutch coaltion negotiations, and the lightning rod personality of Geert Wilders may make that so. He has often gone out of his way to court controversy, like announcing a contest for drawing Mohammed cartoons right at the time Muslims were rioting over that very issue, but hopefully they will be able to get beyond that quickly. Those three parties align well on issues. While Wilders party talks of "zero asylum seekers", the New Social Contract campaigned on putting a low cap on total intake of immigrants and asylum seekers at a level of about ten percent of the number of just asylum seekers entering last year. The VVD's new leader has been their party's most forceful advocate of cracking down on illegal immigration and campaigned on things like restricting the ability of migrants or immigrants to bring family into the country. The Party for Freedom and the New Social Contract are both strict sovereigntists who want to reduce the powers of the EU. With the departure of Rutte, the VVD is now less globalist oriented, so they should be able to work that our.

FIghting illegal immigration is a winning issue for conservatives on both sides of the Atlantic.
Commented: Thursday, November 23rd, 2023 @ 2:29 pm By: Steven P. Rader

Commented on Happy Thanksgiving

One of the stories that should be told more about the Pilgrims is their failed experiment with socialism, something the late Rush Limbaugh told very well:
www.breitbart.com
Commented: Thursday, November 23rd, 2023 @ 2:13 pm By: Steven P. Rader
The climate-industrial complex tries to blame any unusual weather event on "climate change". Like the medieval church blaming such things on punishment from God, the climate alarmists want to blame them today on "punishment from manmade global warming".

A good example was a massive flood a year or two ago in a region of north western Germany, which produced higher floodwaters than any flood event in many centuries. The usual suspects immediately blamed the flood on "climate change". However, it turned out that the main culprit in the severity of the flooding was something that very commonly causes floods to get worse, deforestation. The reason for the deforestation was also telling. THe trees were cut down to make space to build wind turbines and solar farms. So, it was actually climate hysteria that caused the bad flooding, NOT "climate change".
Commented: Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 @ 9:54 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Those special masters hired ultra-partisan Democrat assistant special masters who actually drew the maps, gerrymandered for Democrats. All of that was driven by an extrmme Democrat partisan on the state Supreme Court, far left Justice Anita ("Antifa") Earls. It is good that the court-driven Democrat gerrymandered has bit the dust. It is a noxious and undemocratic power grab for a court to usurp the Constitutional power of elected legislators to draw districts.
Commented: Thursday, November 16th, 2023 @ 9:38 am By: Steven P. Rader
George Orwell wrote decades ago: "Threats to freedom of speech, writing and action, though often trivial in isolation, are cumulative in their effect and, unless checked, lead to a general disrespect for the rights of the citizen." If only he could see his own country, and the western world in general today.

Orwell also wrote: "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
Commented: Monday, November 13th, 2023 @ 4:46 pm By: Steven P. Rader
A similar result happened here in Beaufort County some years ago. Charles Boyette listed a rental house in Belhaven as his residence, but actually lived in a nice waterfront home outside of town. His residence in the town of Belhaven was challenged in Beaufort County Supreior Court and a jury unanimously found that he was not a legal resident of Belhaven, so he was stripped of the town council seat he held.
Commented: Sunday, November 12th, 2023 @ 10:25 am By: Steven P. Rader
There goes Bob, and his wacky definition of "truth" again! The two statutes cited very definitely do exist. What is up for question is thier interpretation, and apparently the SCOTUS has not pronounced on that as yet. Common sense says that "early voting" as it is practiced today under state "no excuse" absentee voting statutes makes a total mockery of those two federal statutes, but there is an open question as to whether the SCOTUS whould have the 'nads to strike those state laws down, at least as to federal elections. Unfortunately, American courts have shown much more reluctance to tackle election shananigans than their counterparts in Europe.
Commented: Monday, November 6th, 2023 @ 6:05 pm By: Steven P. Rader
You have such tunnel vision, Bob. If it is not part of the extreme left's political narrative, you reject it. The big takeaway from Covid is that the lockdown hurt us at least as much as the virus, and the lockdown was all politics. Another takeaway from studies since most of the Covid virus has passed us, is that the mRNA vaccines did not do much good and did more harm than expected. Moderna admits that their jab is "gene therapy" rather than a vaccine, but they did not publicize that to those getting the jab. It is up to each of us to get informed and weigh the risk versus the benefits. When I did, I drove an extra 50 miles each way to get the J&J vaccine, which my research told me was safer than the two mRNA jabs.

We should applaud the work of Rep. Kidwell in our state to get the law changed so a governor like Cooper can no longer singlehandedly impose a lockdown on our state. Other states have also done the same.

The Covid response is a good example of Eisenhower's warning that we should not have scientists making government policy. That was in his farewell speech immediately after his more famous comments about the "military-industrial complex".
Commented: Monday, November 6th, 2023 @ 6:44 am By: Steven P. Rader
What really injected politics into Covid response was the change at the World Health Organization (WHO). The director of WHO during the Covid era was Tedros of Ethiopea, the first non-physician to head the WHO ever. Throughout its previous history, all directors had been physicians but Tedros was a politician and bureaucrat. He liked to call himself "Dr. Tedros" but that degree was an academic PhD (public administration or political science or the like) not a medical MD. Politicking by Communist China won the position for Tedros over a much better qualified British physician.

When it was led by professional medical people, WHO had devised a pandemic emergency plan that relied on herd immunity, but after Communist China adopted the lockdown strategy, their WHO apparatchik Tedros followed suit and junked the well prepared herd immunity strategy. That was all about politics, not about science or medicine. The few places that stuck to the original WHO plan of herd immunity, like Sweden, did much better on battling Covid than those who followed the new WHO Chinese lockdown plan.

The first western country to fall for the lockdown plan was the UK, and that was all politics, too. The best epidemiology and viroloty minds in the country from Oxford and Cambridge proposed a herd immunity plan and that is the way the government was headed until a lesser light from Imperial College London used a PR campaign with blatant scare tactics delivered through the media to stampede the government to move to a lockdown strategy instead.

Fauci just followed in their footsteps.
Commented: Sunday, November 5th, 2023 @ 5:56 pm By: Steven P. Rader
I went down as one of the observers of the sham partial recount conducted by Raffensberger. As I read this article on the subpoenas, they are asking for information that Raffensberger refused to provide previously. I hope they get it so that some of the issues involved can be resolved once and for all. It looks to me like Raffensberger is fearful of what they will find.
Commented: Sunday, November 5th, 2023 @ 5:43 pm By: Steven P. Rader
In this past legislative session, when Rep. Kidwell introduced legislation to be sure our school board had authority if they should choose to adopt a curriculum that the far left opposed, he was told by legislative lawyers that it was not necessary and that the North Carolina law cited in this article already gave them authority to do that. The education bureaucracy both in Raleigh and locally wanats everybody to think they have a veto but under the law they do not. We need more school board members who are willing to exercise the authority that the law gives them on curriculum.

Several states, notably Florida and to a lesser degree Texas are pushing back against these domineering textbook companies. If it has any of the alphabet soup of woke - CRT, DEI, ESG, SEL, etc. - Florida will not approve it.
Commented: Sunday, November 5th, 2023 @ 9:55 am By: Steven P. Rader
Here is a video of a prominent black lady denouncing Critical Race Theory. She is Kemi Badenoch, an immigrant to the UK from Nigeria who made this speech on the floor of the UK House of Commons while serving as Minister of Equalities in Boris Johnston's government, and it was called the "speech of the year" in parliament: www.youtube.com
Commented: Tuesday, October 31st, 2023 @ 8:19 pm By: Steven P. Rader
More ignorance. Nobody is found "guilty" in civil court. Any jurisdiction with an objective jury pool would have tossed out that nothingburger.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 2:00 pm By: Steven P. Rader
The key is looking at the written agreements between the Beaufort County Schools and the Community College.

When two organizations collaborate on a project, there is usually a written agreement signed by them that governs their collaboration, normally called a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). I am familiar with such documents from my time as Resident Country Director for a US-based organization in Moldova, having been involved in negotiating and signing a couple of them with the Moldovan government.

If the MOU between the Community College and the Beaufort County Schools did not already cover this type of situation, one thing that should have been done after the situation arose is to modify it so that it would do so in the future. What has happened is over, and the key here is preventing similar occurences in the future. I did not hear anything from Superintendant Cheeseman that gave any assurance that anything like that was done.

It is actually a positive thing to see school board members rattling some cages on an issue like this. Too many of them sit there like bumps on a log. They really need to demand to see the MOU with the Community College to determine what more needs to be done.

One weakness the Beaufort County Schools has is that their board attorney is out of Raleigh, rather than a local attorney, who could have easily been called in to advise on this matter. Our school board attorneys have always been local attorneys in the past, who have competently represented the school board. Why they go all the way to Raleigh is beyond me. I suspect they are paying a higher hourly rate for a Raleigh attorney as well. When I was General Counsel for a state government department in the Jim Martin administration, we periodically hired outside counsel to handle litigation because our administration did not trust the Democrat Attorney General, and I was the one that arranged that outside counsel. Raleigh attorneys that handled government work had very high hourly rates, and I started hiring well qualified firms to come up from Charlotte because they were cheaper, and on top of that more efficient. There are quite a number of local attorneys here in Beaufort County more than competent to handle the school board's representation.
Commented: Friday, October 27th, 2023 @ 9:35 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Prendiegirl, you must have missed what was happening all over the country in school board elections. There has been a vast earthquake of turning out do-nothing board members for those pledged to take a meat ax to "woke". What is driving this is that with students at home during Covid, parents saw the crap that was in their curriculum and became angry. School boards even in major urban counties are being replaced with conservatives who want to end the "woke" garbage. It is even impacting other elections, like in Virginia, where it was a key factor in electing Republicans to all statewide offices.

Here in North Carolina, a poll by the Civitas Institute found that 71% of North Carolina parents were concerned about indoctrination of their children in the public schools. That says a lot about why voters are turning against "business as usual" school board members who just go along with whatever the education establishment puts forward.

I know that there is a little political cult that sees Hood Richardson hiding behind every bush, but Hood Derangement Syndrome (which is like Trump Derangement Syndrome) is not the explanation of voters turning to known conservatives in Beaufort County or any other school board elections.

Many conservatives, including myself and former State Representative Sandy Hardy helped encourage conservative candidates to run in the last school board election. All of those elected were strong personalities who stand on principle and are not led around by anyone. They research the issues themselves and make up their own minds.

I know that there is one of the school board members up next year who at least has a heart in the right place on school issues, but it takes more than that. It takes a backbone to stand up against the "woke" agenda. That aspect is still to be determined, as there will probably still be opportunities to show the presence or absence of such backbone. There are also two liberal Democrats on the board who will not deviate from woke and need to be replaced.

If you really want to credit the person most responsible for pushing for a better school board in Beaufort County, that would be former Belhaven Mayor Adam Oneal. Adam first got involved with education issues in helping parents fight some of the stupid Covid policies in the county schools, and went on to pick up on other concerns of parents.

We still have a school board that adopts common core math injected with "woke" for its math curriculum. The county schools curriculum direstor falsely told the board that the Bridges curriculum was not common core, and when people researched it and found out it was, he had to admit that it was. There is more work to be done. Parents, conservative school board members, and conservative legislators have been fighting common core math for years since it first showed up in our state.
Commented: Friday, October 27th, 2023 @ 1:33 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Another attack on American democracy that ultra-partisan Democrat prosecutor Fanni Willis is doing in Georgia is trying to criminalize the contesting of a questionable election. This has been accepted part of American democracy since our founding and now Willis wants to distort the law to criminalize it. Even in Georgia, there is one of Willis' fellow leftwing black Democrat women who ran for governor just a few short years ago and makes similar charges that Trump did about her own election, but with a whole lot less basis. This is one of the clear double standards the left is dividing our judicial system with.

Indeed, democracy abroad abounds with open challenges of election results. Earlier this year, the German state of Berlin had a new election that changed the result after the first election was successfully challenged in the Constitutional Court. The city of London in the UK reran an election in the Tower Hamlets district after a successful challenge due to election fraud there. The entire parliamentary election in Ukraine was re-run after the first election was successfully challenged in the Constitutional Court in the Orange Revolution case. I had the privelege to meet the two Ukrainian lawyers who won that case when I hired them to train political party lawyers in Moldova.
Commented: Thursday, October 26th, 2023 @ 10:59 am By: Steven P. Rader
Stan, if you are referring to the phone call Raffensberger recorded from Trump that the Democrats make such a big deal over, if you listen to the whole thing instead of the snippet they push, he is making a point to Raffensberger about why he needs a full recount as the hurdle he has to get over is fairly small. There is nothing at all criminal about pushing for a full recount. Heck a LOT of Democrats have done that and then claimed to find new boxes of ballots in closets, trunks of cars, and whereever that just happen to be mostly Democrat. That has happened in several races for Senate, governor, or Congress. Never any criminal investigations but they have stolen a number of public offices that way.

I have never known of Republicans in recounts to claim finding "missing" ballot boxes. They have just wanted a second look to see if things were counted correctly. In Georgia, there were some really questionable activities in the election night count, especially the mail in ballot count for Fulton County, where they ran off the election observers. What was recorded on a security camera that they apparently did not know was filming was appalling to say the least.
Commented: Wednesday, October 25th, 2023 @ 10:34 am By: Steven P. Rader
Those who are sadly destroying the American judicial system are the Democrats who are using it for power politics to try to destroy their political enemies. The things they now want to call crimes were not considered crimes in the past but they now make up their own interpretation of laws.

The Gore camp did a lot more to try to manipulate an election in 2000, than what the Democrats are claiming on Trump, but there was not even a hint of prosecution then. Some of the shananigans they were involved in to try to change the result in Florida, required the US Supreme Court to step in and shut the Gore Democrats down.

The Gore Democrats did not stop there. They tried to get members of the Electoral College to change their votes to Gore. Having myself been a member of that Electoral College from North Carolina, I well remember that. Somehow, they got my email address and that of other Electors and flooded our inboxes with emails asking us to break the law and not vote for Bush. They even got some phone numbers and harassed us by telephone. These were open solicitations asking us as Electors to break the law. Nothing was ever prosecuted or even investigated from that.

In Georgia, what President Trump was asking Raffensberger for was a full recount of ballots instead of the limited recount Raffensberger called for. That is what Trump is being prosecuted for. The Gore people were breaking the law in Florida in the course of an actual full recount, and they were soliciting presidential Electors to break the law. None of that was even investigated.

This is a new world in American politics of using courts to punish political enemies. Some are calling it lawfare, a take on "warfare". It is a disgusting perversion of our legal system.
Commented: Wednesday, October 25th, 2023 @ 10:14 am By: Steven P. Rader
You are clueless, Bob. One of the things that pressures defendants in criminal cases is the enormously high cost of criminal defense, which can ruin people financially from a major case. Sure Trump cannot be pressured on that because he is very wealthy, but neither can the poor because the taxpayers are paying for their appointed lawyers. It is the MIDDLE CLASS defendants that feels this pressure. They have neither the money of the wealthy nor the free lawyers of the poor.

It is the middle class targets of this partisan prosecutor who are vulnerable to this pressure. If they do not dance to her tune, they face financial ruin and potential heavy jail time. It not about truth, it is about conforming to her narrative. When this is going on in a political prosecution, as it is, then democracy in our country is hanging by a thread.
Commented: Tuesday, October 24th, 2023 @ 11:26 am By: Steven P. Rader
The term "trumped up charges" has long been used for bogus criminal charges, but with the political witch hunt against President Trump, that meaning has been reinforced. The danger here is partisan prosecutors with political motives targeting a political opponent and strongarming others they charge to join their lynch mob, so that political target gets an ambush instead of a trial. Bringing charges in places they know that the jury pool will be politically hostile to their target also helps make the process an ambush rather than a trial. Without a change of venue, there will be no fair trial in any of these cases except the ones in Florida. Even that murder trial I refered to earlier had venue changed from Martin County to Pitt County to get a fair jury.

As to poor people, they are less intimidated by these DA tactics, since they have court appointed lawyers and therefore do not have the worry about being financially ruined by legal defense costs. They are insulated from some of the impacts that can be brought to bear on more well to do defendants.

The political targeting go on against Trump is what is scary for the future of American democracy. If Republicans win in 2024, there are now certain to be some making lists of Biden officials to indict when the shoe is on the other foot. In 200 years of our republic, no one has gone there until the Biden Democrats opened the door to it.
Commented: Tuesday, October 24th, 2023 @ 9:47 am By: Steven P. Rader
The squeeze by the far left Democrat prosecutor in Georgia on other defendants is a huge danger to coercing questionable testimony against President Trump. It is a targeted version of the common prosecutor squeeze on co-defendants. Most prosecutors just want to bolster their conviction record, and having a co-defendant rat out other defendants helps them get convictions. When a co-defendant pleads to a lesser charge in return for "truthful testimony", truth is not measured by whether it would pass a polygraph, but whether it works with the prosecutor's theory of the case. Deviate from what the prosecutor wants, and one loses his or her plea deal.

In a run of the mill case, if the prosecutor gets one defendant to flip, they will go along with that defendants version of what the others did, which is often tilted. For example, in a four defendant capital murder case where I was first chair counsel for one of the defendants, another co-defendant flipped and told a version to minimize his role and portray much larger roles for the other three. The DA just wanted convictions, so he went with that. Four defense attorneys for other defendants concluded that based on other known facts, the "cooperating defendant" was almost certainly the triggerman and the instigator of the murder, but he put that off on others.

Now take a DA like the one in Georgia who has an agenda in the case, a particular defendant she is after. No other defendant is going to get a plea deal unless they tell the story the way that DA wants to go after that particular defendant. It doesn't matter what the actual truth is, they have to conform to the "truth" as that DA sees it.

Paul Manafort and Roger Stone both came forward to reveal that anti-Trump prosecutors offered them sweetheart deals if they would tell what the prosecutor wanted against Trump. They knew the prosecutor's version was a lie, so they accepted time in prison rather than lie for a crooked prosecutor.

The financial burden of contesting any of these cases would likely break most of the co-defendants financially, and enough charges are piled on that they would do significant jail time if found guilty. These defendants, especially the lawyers among them, also know they are facing a jury pool that will be highly unfavorable to President Trump or anyone associated with him. The places where these cases were brought were chosen for that very reason. These defendants want to survive this and have a life on the other side, and all of this creates an enormous pressure to just say whatever it is the DA considers "the truth" in order to save their own skins. Few have the stamina of Manafort and Stone to do what is right and stick to the actual factual truth.

Donald Trump is facing a kangaroo court in Georgia, and that is a threat to American democracy. Of course, the DC and Manhattan situations are not much better. At the very basic level, without a change of venue to get an unbiased jury, the Georgia, New York, and DC cases all present fairness problems in a big way and need a change of venue at a minimum but it is highly unlikely that will happen.

Welcome to the new American banana republic.
Commented: Monday, October 23rd, 2023 @ 6:34 pm By: Steven P. Rader
I think Ken Buck is someone who "went native" inside the Washington beltway, as some do. When he ran for the US Senate, he was thoroughly vetted and endorsed by the Senate Conservatives Fund and the Club for Growth, and they are each very good at weeding out the phonies.
Commented: Saturday, October 21st, 2023 @ 4:45 pm By: Steven P. Rader
Ken Buck, one of those stabbing the GOP caucus in the back, had the audacity to send me a fundraising email a day or two ago. I told him to stick it where the sun does not shine.

I am on his mailing list for giving his US Senate campaign some money some years ago. He was the candidate backing by several national conservative organizations against McConnell's candidate. When McConnell's boy lost the primary, McConnell did everything he could to undercut Buck so he would lose the general election. I initially was pleased to see him win a House seat, but in the last year or so, he has started going off the reservation quite a bit, and this is the latest one. Now I would be inclined to send a contribution to his priimary opponent.

Republican activists are fed up with the Ken Bucks of the Congress.
Commented: Saturday, October 21st, 2023 @ 3:14 pm By: Steven P. Rader
The new Senate map is also out, and our Senate district remains the same. I heard a rumor about Perry running for Congress now that Lenoir County has been shifted to the 1st Congressional district, but I am not sure of the source of that rumor's knowledge.
Commented: Friday, October 20th, 2023 @ 7:28 am By: Steven P. Rader
« Newer     Older »     

HbAD0

 
 
Back to Top