President Trump Won’t Take the Iranian Bait on Iraq | Eastern North Carolina Now

Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the LifeZette, and written by David Kamioner.

    In a childish attempt to lure President Donald Trump into a general war, ruling Iranian mullah Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the president in a statement on Wednesday, "You can't do a damn thing!"

    That was in response to the unsuccessful Iranian-backed Tuesday mob and Islamist militia attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Iraq - and the president's Tuesday night vow to make the Iranians pay a "big price" for their sponsorship of the attack.

    The ayatollah mistakes the president's domestic political bluster - as do his domestic opponents - for thin skin and a knee-jerk reaction to slights. More savvy analysts see a method behind the president's usual hyperbole.

    His aggressive candor is deployed to take the message initiative away from this opponents and make them react to his moves, just as the ayatollah is doing here.

    President Trump has the initiative because he has reinforced the embassy in Baghdad with 100 U.S. Marines, called in attack air assets, and has ordered a force of 750 paratroopers from the U.S. 82nd Airborne Division to the region.

    They should land shortly or already have. They'll be followed by the rest of the 4,000 airborne-trooper strong Division Ready Brigade of the 82nd. Taking note of the current and upcoming reinforcements and realizing they have no chance of victory, the Iranian-backed Iraqi mobs left the scene on Wednesday.

    These are prudent steps of deterrence - and show a canny restraint on the part of the president as well.

    The Iranians would like nothing more than to involve the U.S. in a protracted war close to their own turf in an American election year.

    They could falsely try to justify any terrorist outrage anywhere in the world as a legitimate response to supposed American aggression. There are people around the world and in this country who would listen to them and support them in the effort.

    Coincidently, this country's Democrat Party, regardless of any cost in U.S. lives and material that would be involved in such a war, would likely relish the possibility of such a conflict. Democrats know that keeping the country safe, prosperous, and at peace is a vital prerequisite to a Trump victory at the polls this November of 2020.

    As they have done in other conflicts such as the Vietnam War - and given the noted presence in their own party of such leftist radicals as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) - the Dems would likely side with U.S. battlefield opponents and do everything they could to hinder an American war effort.

    But just as with the Iranians, the president is too shrewd to take their bait. He will guard our interests in the region and protect out installations and personnel - and he will not get the nation involved in another Middle Eastern quagmire.

    By doing so, he will keep yet a further campaign promise to the American people.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Julián Castro Drops Out of 2020 Democratic Primary Race Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics A Telling Tale of Two Embassies


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country
populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue

HbAD2

 
Back to Top