High Court's Obamacare Decision Looms | Eastern North Carolina Now

   Publisher's note: This post, by Karen Duquette, was originally published in the Issues section of Civitas's online edition.

    This month the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down one of the most consequential decisions in its history by ruling on the constitutionality of Obamacare.

    On March 26-28, the Court heard an unprecedented six hours of oral arguments concerning the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare. The justices asked several important and pointed questions about the main controversy swirling around the Act -- the individual mandate. The crux of the issue boils down to this: Can commercial inaction be regulated under the Commerce Clause?

    Under the Constitution, the federal government has only limited authority and specific, delegated powers. One of the powers, granted under the Commerce Clause, enables the federal government to regulate interstate commerce. Over time, the Commerce Clause has expanded to include several types of commercial activity but it has never before been applied to inaction.
The United States Supreme Court in early march, 2012: Above.     photo by Stan Deatherage

    Not purchasing health insurance is inaction. Yet the Obama Administration has argued that eventually all Americans will participate in health services and this must amount to commercial activity -- or action. Therefore, the Administration claims, everyone should be forced to purchase health insurance to help mitigate the costs of those who have no insurance.

    If we accept this argument, however, what's to stop the government from controlling every decision in our lives? Fruit and vegetables are healthy for us and if we eat more of them, we may avoid expensive medical costs down the road. So why don't we just go ahead and mandate that everyone purchase a certain number of healthy foods weekly? Everyone eventually dies and funerals are expensive, so what's to stop the government from forcing all Americans to purchase a burial insurance plan?

    It is these types of philosophical questions that the Court will have to consider when it makes its decision, expected in late June. Justices Anthony Kennedy and John Roberts will likely be the deciding factors. If they agree with the conservatives and reject the healthcare overhaul in its entirety, Obamacare will fail. If not, Obamacare could be implemented in full or in part. Let us hope the Supreme Court stands firm on the principles of freedom and limited government and rejects an ever-expanding and encroaching leftist agenda.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Things that Make Noise in the Night, Part IX Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Washington City Council dabbles in failed liberal ideas


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges

HbAD1

prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better

HbAD2

 
Back to Top