Barrett vs. Big, Unaccountable Government | Beaufort County Now | Paul Larkin explains in a Federalist column why advocates of big government should worry about Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination. | john locke foundation, amy coney barrett, unnaccountable government, big government, october 9, 2020

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Barrett vs. Big, Unaccountable Government

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Paul Larkin explains in a Federalist column why advocates of big government should worry about Judge Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination.

  • A major criticism of the administrative state is that it consists of unelected officials with the power to govern virtually every aspect of modern life without serious oversight by the federal courts. That issue might arise during the upcoming Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee for the current opening on the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Barrett, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, has been on the bench for less than three years, so her judicial oeuvre is relatively small. Nonetheless, critics of her nomination — both those fearful of how she might vote as a Supreme Court justice and those who just hate Trump and anything he does — will dissect every paragraph and sentence of every opinion and article she has written. ...
  • ... Barrett's authored opinions give no reason to believe she automatically accepts or rejects an agency's interpretation of the law. For example, consider her dissenting opinion in the controversial case of Cook County, Illinois v. Wolf. The administrative law issue in Wolf involved the proper application of the Supreme Court's decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which directs federal courts to accept a reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous federal law, even if the court would read the law differently. ...
  • ... Barrett did not reflexively accept the DHS rule as being reasonable. Instead, she wrote a 39-page dissent, rigorously analyzing the relevant statutory text, its development across history, and various commentators' descriptions of the immigration laws. Only then did she conclude that DHS's interpretation was reasonable.
  • The opinions Barrett has joined also do not suggest she uncritically accepts an agency's interpretation of the law.


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

As he nears inauguration this week, President-Elect Joe Biden has proposed a $1.9 trillion relief package.
Get your batsuit and hang tight with the Wolfman as we enter into Gotham City for battle.
Will Europe be a harbinger of things to come in America
With the U.S. Supreme Court shutting the door this month on future legal action, a state Supreme Court decision will continue to dictate the University of North Carolina’s compliance with public records requests linked to sexual assaults.
Army relieves dozens of soldiers for political reasons
Vice President Mike Pence reportedly called Vice-President Elect Kamala Harris on Thursday to congratulate her on her win.
The Pentagon has reportedly turned down a request from President Donald Trump to have an extravagant sendoff from the White House, nixing the president’s plans to have a military parade at Joint Base Andrews before he departs Washington, D.C.


Many of us are very frustrated with the present political situation in both North Carolina and the Washington, D. C.
Gov. Roy Cooper is again pushing for a multibillion-dollar infrastructure bond, but Republican leaders caution that North Carolina’s still-unsteady economy makes it impossible to tell whether it would be prudent.
Order to release information within 180 days was part of $2.3 trillion COVID-19 relief bill
Clarice Feldman of the American Thinker explores the political calculations linked to President Trump’s second impeachment.
Governor Roy Cooper announced today that the North Carolina Executive Mansion will be illuminated on January 19, 2021, at 5:30 PM in remembrance of the lives lost as in the COVID-19 pandemic.
In her fine opinion piece for the Martin Center, Megan Zogby bemoans the “Quixotic” requirement that North Carolina college and university students take between two and four courses in a language such as Spanish, French, or German.
In this installment, we will discuss the "controversial" Gospel of Judas and how it can be used to decipher cryptic messages made by actors portraying the role of "Judas" in the current political arena..
Frank Main and Fran Spielman write in the Chicago Sun-Times about one consequence of the recent nationwide attack on police.
West Virginia leads the nation in COVID-19 vaccine administration and distribution, even more so than other states that have gained attention for their vaccine rollout strategies, according to federal data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Bill Moore looks at the Democrats call for unity
He denounced the assault on the Capitol. But still the Democrats want his head.
Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich writes at that the Republican Party is not as likely to fracture as its opponents hope.
Newly sworn in Chief Justice Paul Newby is wasting little time in getting North Carolina’s court system back up and running.
I’ve joined many others, including the President of the United States, in being locked out of Twitter for posing a tweet about hydroxychloroquine that I posted time and time again and that Twitter had already found to be in compliance with its rules.
This email came from an unknown source but we like it
He may be giving the cult group too much credit.
From a Birmingham jail, where he was arrested for trying to help blacks exercise their right to vote, MLK wrote: "Remember, everything that Hitler did was legal."


Back to Top