Most Young Americans Don’t Want To Silence Debate | Eastern NC Now

Samuel Abrams writes at Real Clear Education about relatively good news for the future of free speech.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Samuel Abrams writes at Real Clear Education about relatively good news for the future of free speech.

  • Though colleges and universities have been open for only a few weeks, reports are already circulating of speakers and professors being cancelled or even attacked because of their ideas or speech. Yet while many are quick to condemn students and America's younger generation generally as leftists afraid to hear ideas and eager to shut down non-progressive thinkers, this reputation is unfair and inaccurate.
  • Just-released data make it apparent that younger Americans remain overwhelmingly centrist and open-minded. In 2019, UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute found that 67 percent of first-year college students were open to having their views challenged. Moreover, while large numbers of students regularly state that they do not feel that they can express unpopular opinions, more than two-thirds agree with the statement, "dissent is a critical component of the political process."
  • As new data from Reality Check Insights reveal, an overwhelming majority of young people are willing to shut down speech regarded as harmful and untrue — such as Holocaust denial, which 70 percent of Millennials and Gen Zers would ban from campuses. Yet large majorities of younger Americans oppose cancelling or limiting expressions of controversial or even offensive views: 69 percent would welcome a speaker on campus who opposed the Black Lives Matter movement, for example, while 81 percent would welcome a guest speaking in support of BLM.
  • In this area, at least, the young are more pro-free speech than older generations. Just 54 percent of Boomers, for instance, would welcome a supporter of BLM, though 70 percent would endorse bringing in a speaker in opposition to BLM. ...
  • ... Collectively, these new data show that young people are not as closeminded as portrayed — so long as they regard the ideas they're hearing as legitimate. The virtues and vices of BLM are open to debate; Holocaust denial is not. Millennials and Gen Zers welcome discourse on topics worthy of debate but are not interested in giving platforms to hate speech.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Tax Revenue Still on Pace With Last Year John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Without Lab Time or Facilities, Students Get Lower-Quality Education


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics


HbAD1

AG Jay Jones was candidate who called for death of rival and rival's children
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Musk plans to relaunch America PAC, the same political group that spent hundreds of millions helping elect President Donald Trump in 2024.
Farmers are being squeezed by lower commodity prices and higher operating costs.
Don’t believe the hysterics or the lies – Medicaid work requirements won’t kill anyone

HbAD2

Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay allowing the Trump administration to continue construction of the ballroom as SCOTUS waits.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top