Making Money From Climate Alarmism | Beaufort County Now | You’ll be shocked — shocked! — to learn that some enterprising souls stand to make big money from the alarmism associated with climate policy.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Making Money From Climate Alarmism

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    You'll be shocked — shocked! — to learn that some enterprising souls stand to make big money from the alarmism associated with climate policy. Rubert Darwall writes about the issue for Real Clear Energy.

  • In normal times, before the Climate Emergency, it would be up to financiers and investors to ask the tough, unsentimental questions, such as: What's the return on investment? How long is the payback period? But not when it comes to climate change. In its 2018 1.5? Special Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) declined to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the net-zero target. The target, the IPCC declared, implies "risk assessments and value judgments" - as if this nullified the need to assess whether the benefits of net-zero outweigh the costs.
  • At the end of his Reith lecture, [Mark] Carney was asked by historian Niall Ferguson if he'd read Bjorn Lomborg's most recent book, False Alarm. Lomborg calculates that each $1 spent on cutting greenhouse gas emissions yields only 11 cents of future climate benefits. With trillions being spent on climate change, this estimate implies that a colossal burden is being placed on the current generation - especially those who can least afford to bear it - for little climate gain. Ignorance is no defense; nonetheless, Carney tried it. No, he hadn't read Lomborg's book, Carney answered Ferguson. He dismissed Lomborg's as a "classic economic approach," though he offered no data or evidence to show why Lomborg was wrong. ...
  • ... A February 2021 paper by David Rode and Paul Fischbeck of Carnegie Mellon University examines the pervasiveness of apocalyptic forecasts of climate change. "The only observations we have of prior apocalyptic forecasts are of forecast failures," they note. "There is no rational model of decision making that attributes increasing credibility to forecasts upon successive failures." By the end of 2020, 61% of the predictions had already expired. The average time horizon before a climate apocalypse for the predictions made before 2000 was 22 years; for those made since 2000, it was 21 years. Across half a century of forecasts, the apocalypse is always around 20 years out.

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

climate alarmists claimed it was dying and would soon be completely dead
Chancellor Kurz takes firm action again: US needs to follow his lead
Why were we doing business helping the Chi Coms build weapons of mass destruction (germ warfare)?
Jordan Hall, the pastor of Fellowship Baptist Church in Sidney, Montana, preaches a blistering, barn burning yet biblically faithful sermon on transgenderism and transhumanism. It grabs you from the get-go and doesn’t let up. Give it a listen!

HbAD1

Retired SEAL's run for House seats in Congress
In recent years, our asylum laws have been abused and misused by illegal immigrants who are primarily economic migrants and are not otherwise eligible to immigrate to the United States
Timed to Gates/Soros purchase of covid testing company
In case you haven’t been paying attention, Los Angeles Angels pitcher and hitter Shohei Ohtani has been on fire at the plate.
Gov. Roy Cooper this year said his administration was exploring the development of a vaccine passport for residents.

HbAD2

Fauci vs facts on Delta variant
When you think your commissioners are bad just look around
Jack Beyrer of the Washington Free Beacon reports one congressional proposal to hold China accountable for COVID-19.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top