Conservatives Are Not Alone in Opposing Unchecked Majorities | Eastern NC Now

Charles Cooke of National Review Online challenges another canard from the political left.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Charles Cooke of National Review Online challenges another canard from the political left.

  • Jonathan Chait tries once again to cast Rand Paul and Mike Lee's entirely mainstream skepticism toward unchecked majoritarianism as something sinister and unusual. The ideas that Paul and Lee have expressed, Chait writes, are common on the Right, and, indeed, "are not identified solely with the most extreme or Trumpy conservatives," but "have frequently been articulated by conservatives who express deep personal animosity toward Donald Trump and his cultists."
  • Yeah, they have. And do you know who else is skeptical of unchecked majoritarianism?
  • Everyone. ...
  • ... How, I wonder, does Chait account for the counter-majoritarian decisions that his own side strongly favors? The anti-abortion laws that Roe v. Wade overturned were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy. The laws that protected traditional marriage were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy - and, in several cases, popular referenda. The laws permitting school prayer were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy.
  • All of these laws were swept away despite that democracy. Why? Because they were held to be in violation of the Constitution's protection of minority rights. (In my view, these cases were incorrectly decided, but my objection is to the specifics of those cases rather than to the existence of judicial review). If Jonathan Chait were to call up a Democratic senator at random this afternoon and ask whether he thinks that this was a good thing, that Democratic senator would likely end up sounding very much like Rand Paul. I wonder: Is that an indictment of the Democratic party, its voters, and the broader progressive movement? Or does it only work the other way around?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Climate Alarmists Like Luxury Beachfront Property John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Inflation roars as Biden fiddles


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Maybe a holiday for Texas, but NOT the nation
government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1


HbAD2

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top