SB 362, Study Energy Efficiency Standards: A Bill Only Al Gore Could Love

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.85% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

1.15% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
87 Vote(s)

View all Polls

SB 362, Study Energy Efficiency Standards: A Bill Only Al Gore Could Love

Published: Thursday, April 4th, 2013 @ 2:11 pm
By: Civitas Insitute ( More Entries )

Publisher's note: This post, by Brian Balfour, was originally published in the Bad Bill of the Week section of Civitas's online edition.

This week's Bad Bill of the Week is SB 362, Study Energy Efficiency Standards. Sponsored by Sen. Eleanor Kinnaird (D-Orange), this bill would create a study of an ineffective "tiered" billing format for electricity, impossible goals for electricity-use reduction, and an ambiguous "pollution tax."

    Tiered electricity rates mean that the more electricity you use, the higher per kilowatt-hour rate you pay. It would also charge higher rates during peak energy use times. Such a mechanism is popular in other states such as California, but according to the Los Angeles Times, "A growing body of research suggests that not only does tiered pricing fail to meet these goals, it is counterproductive: It neither encourages conservation nor helps low-income people pay for power."

    SB 362 also states that such tiered pricing would create a decrease of total electricity consumption in the state by a whopping 60 percent below 2010 levels - and in just 10 years. In a state with a growing population, that seems especially unrealistic. Imagine attempting to curb your electricity use by 60 percent - do you really leave that many lights on?

    Moreover, the bill also raises the potential for "a pollution tax on certain appliances" - those deemed as not meeting "energy star" status. There are also proposed taxpayer handouts for "energy efficiency activities," whatever those may be defined to be. Clearly, these last provisions are designed as a boondoggle for politically-correct appliance makers, at taxpayers' expense.

    SB 362 is an attempt to further micromanage our daily lives and empower politicians with more control over everyday comforts of living we enjoy. Such an intrusion into our lives and use of private property is unacceptable, and that is why SB 362 is this week's Bad Bill of the Week.

Go Back