|
Joined as jlecompte on Wednesday, February 20th, 2013 @ 1:13 pm
|
|
Joined as Ayden on Thursday, August 24th, 2023 @ 6:27 pm
|
|
Joined as GC1670806197 on Sunday, December 11th, 2022 @ 4:06 pm
|
Latest Comment(s) by John (view all)|
Joined as GC1665979693 on Sunday, October 16th, 2022 @ 8:39 pm
|
Latest Comment(s) by John (view all)|
Commented On Biden Administration Unveils New Restrictions On Air Conditioners Despite Backlash Over Gas Stove Restrictions
So I guess Biden is making millions off china and soros.
|
Apr 12th, 2023 @ 1:28 am |
|
Joined as Johnnyboy72 on Wednesday, August 9th, 2017 @ 1:28 pm
|
|
Joined as GC1671205535 on Friday, December 16th, 2022 @ 5:59 am
|
Latest Comment(s) by John Brown (view all)|
Commented On White House Lit Up With Symbol Of Religious Cult
AMERICA'S FOUNDATION IS AND ALLWAY'S HAS BEEN, and WILL BE
ALWAYS, A CHRISTAN NATION |
Dec 16th, 2022 @ 5:59 am |
|
Joined as Wooligood on Friday, February 19th, 2021 @ 5:41 am
|
|
Joined as JDSmith on Monday, May 2nd, 2022 @ 2:06 pm
|
|
Joined as kttkdj on Sunday, December 11th, 2022 @ 3:00 pm
|
|
Joined as Miegestag76 on Sunday, December 11th, 2022 @ 2:01 pm
|
|
Joined as jdixon5100 on Thursday, January 10th, 2013 @ 2:47 pm
|
|
Joined as GC1689986011 on Friday, July 21st, 2023 @ 8:12 pm
|
Latest Comment(s) by John doe (view all)|
Joined as Johndroz on Tuesday, March 12th, 2013 @ 9:10 pm
|
Latest Entries by John Droz, Jr. (view all)Jul 27th, 2014 @ 11:53 am |
Jun 26th, 2014 @ 10:40 am |
Apr 15th, 2014 @ 4:57 pm |
Feb 19th, 2014 @ 9:32 am |
Feb 7th, 2014 @ 10:56 pm |
Latest Comment(s) by John Droz, Jr. (view all)|
Commented On NC's Green New Deal – the anatomy of a betrayal
Mr Steed:
TY for your concerns and good commentary. FYI, prior to HB951 being voted on, I wrote up a detailed Critique of it, and emailed it to every NC Republican legislator. Here is the url . Some Republican legislators stood up to their leadership (e.g. Larry Pittman, George Cleveland, etc.). However, despite my attempt to get citizens to speak to their representatives about this, not enough did. For more info, please send me an email at "aaprjohn" at "northnet" dot "org". |
Nov 16th, 2021 @ 11:50 am |
|
Joined as hamilljo on Monday, June 28th, 2021 @ 12:01 pm
|
|
Joined as DarkSkiesFlyer on Friday, February 28th, 2025 @ 10:13 am
|
Latest Comment(s) by John Heermann (view all)|
Commented On Republican Purge
Mr. Fucito you seem to have spent a lot of effort explaining why things talked about in a recess dont go into a set of minutes. That all seems logical. What I dont see you explaining is why there was so much effort involved to avoid a meeting or reconvening one. Seems like that WOULD require minutes and nobody wanted the ouster of Unca Hood and the other two ladies to be on record much less that the police were called. If something isnt rotten enough to pass the smell test there usually isnt a need to try to keep it in the dark.
|
Jan 26th, 2026 @ 3:36 pm |
|
Commented On Pete Hegseth Celebrates The U.S. Army’s 250th Birthday: ‘There Is No 1776 Without 1775’
Giving the Army a grand 250th birthday celebration was the right move. It is important to remind the people of this nation (99% who have not served themselves since the creation of the all volunteer military) what it takes to give us the freedoms we enjoy. This is more important given all of the things happening with China, Iran, Russia, North Korea and more. Hegseth served low enough in the ranks not to be corrupted by the bureaucratic and political issues that have been detrimental to the military over the past 20-30 years. His leadership and vision to bring back the focus on lethality and the warrior ethos within our armed forces is vital and necessary. The sharp increase in recruitment since Trump was reelected is a clear demonstration that the people who serve and protect America, many who come from multiple generations of veterans, didnt agree with the Biden/Obama eras of DEI and mismanagement in DoD.
|
Jun 19th, 2025 @ 3:54 pm |
|
Commented On What does it mean to be a Conservative?
Wasn't our nation started because We the People opposed an actual King? Were we not opposed to taxation without representation? Did we not fight back when those who would oppress us came for our firearms, the AR-15s of the day, at Lexington and Concord? Don't our founding documents lay out a limited federal government so that the sovereign states could represent their people according to what they believed best? People shouldn't fear their government, governments should fear their people. They do work for us after all, not the other way around. Its sad to many people don't realize this or remember it. Its a travesty the bureaucrats and seemingly more often the judiciary don't understand this either.
|
Jun 19th, 2025 @ 2:55 pm |
|
Joined as 18square on Tuesday, September 15th, 2015 @ 11:21 am
|
|
Joined as Jon_I on Friday, May 25th, 2012 @ 9:16 pm
|
Latest Entries by John Inzerillo, M.D. (view all)Aug 25th, 2012 @ 5:40 pm |
Jul 31st, 2012 @ 7:44 am |
Jul 23rd, 2012 @ 1:30 am |
Jul 4th, 2012 @ 3:43 pm |
Jun 30th, 2012 @ 9:04 pm |
|
Joined as johnl on Tuesday, April 5th, 2011 @ 10:32 pm
|
Latest Entries by John Lacava (view all)Sep 27th, 2022 @ 5:47 pm |
Aug 12th, 2022 @ 7:14 pm |
Jul 23rd, 2022 @ 2:42 pm |
Jul 18th, 2022 @ 7:36 pm |
Jul 8th, 2022 @ 8:52 pm |
|
Joined as JDPL on Tuesday, February 7th, 2012 @ 3:22 pm
|
Latest Entries by John Latham (view all)Apr 14th, 2014 @ 12:49 am |
Latest Comment(s) by John Latham (view all)|
Commented On Would Jesus Carry a Gun??? Part I
Your last comment sums up quite well what I make of it. Jesus was no coward, when the time was appropriate, He used violence in righteousness. Then, again when the time called for it, He was compassionate and spoke against unnecessary violence. The only complexity of the issue is when to use use violence righteously, and when to avoid it. If violence was immoral in and of itself, and the weapons of violence also, we would not have Law Enforcement, the Military, or any other defense against physical evil; so long as we desired to be moral people. The question is less "would Jesus carry a gun," and more "when would righteous men use a gun."
|
Aug 8th, 2014 @ 9:41 am |
|
Commented On Would Jesus Carry a Gun??? Part I
Gene, what you are trying to accomplish is shaming people into not defending themselves from harm by holding them to an impossible standard. Jesus did not have to "stoop" to carrying a gun (Thanks Mr. Deatherage, for joining the shaming) because He was the Son of God. The rest of us are mere mortals living in an evil world, in the world but not of it. I encourage you again to take a look at www.biblicalselfdefense.com.
|
Aug 7th, 2014 @ 9:58 am |
|
Commented On Would Jesus Carry a Gun??? Part I
Thankyou, Gene. I know we all, well most of us, want to live in a safe world where morality and reason guide the actions of young men, but that world does not exist. If our world today is The Wild West, with mothers hanging long-irons on their hips, it is the criminals that make it that way, not those who would protect themselves from crime.
An openly carried gun certainly gets attention, but that is the point. A concealed weapon may be used to protect oneself once a crime has been initiated, but an openly visible gun may prevent the crime entirely. I think it's good that she kept a 'clean' appearance while carrying. This helps set a good impression of 'responsible gun owner' instead of 'gun rights nut militia-psycho.' When I see someone in torn jeans, with an untucked t-shirt spouting needlessly aggressive patriotism, and a scowl as mean as the handgun strapped into their 'tacti-cool' thigh holster, I immediately think 'Danger, hothead, avoid.' However, someone in slacks with a collared shirt, a clean haircut and a recently shaved or trimmed beard makes me think of them as law abiding and 'socially acceptable,' even with their gun in full view. Image matters a lot with open carry, I believe. As for Jesus, I won't parse scripture, but He did command his apostles to arm themselves. Why would he do that if he believed that defense wasn't necessary? He argues against Paul's cutting off the Roman soldier's ear because He knew that what was going to happen had to happen. Paul acted when he should have accepted. Check out www.biblicalselfdefense.com where people far wiser than I explain the Biblical foundations of personal self defense. |
Jul 28th, 2014 @ 10:29 am |
|
Joined as GC1664459421 on Wednesday, September 28th, 2022 @ 6:19 pm
|
Latest Comment(s) by John Livesay Sr (view all)|
Joined as john on Monday, February 20th, 2012 @ 8:43 am
|
Latest Entries by John Locke Foundation (view all)Jan 30th, 2026 @ 10:27 am |
Nov 28th, 2025 @ 5:54 pm |
Oct 13th, 2025 @ 8:45 pm |
Sep 8th, 2025 @ 9:17 am |
Sep 1st, 2025 @ 9:19 am |
|
Joined as smogdog on Wednesday, February 7th, 2024 @ 3:17 pm
|
Latest Comment(s) by JOHN MacILROY (view all)