North Carolina’s Fight for a Bill of Rights | Eastern North Carolina Now

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Brenee Goforth.

    North Carolina has long been a proponent of a Bill of Rights. In its 1776 constitution, the state of North Carolina chose to begin its constitution with a Bill of Rights. In the book, The South's Role in the Creation of the Bill of Rights, contributor and Former Notre Dame Professor Walter F. Pratt, Jr. said:

  • Most notable about the North Carolina constitution of 1776 is the Declaration of Rights, which precedes the constitution, having been passed the day before the constitution itself. Fletcher Green has made the suggestive observation that "[i]t seems from this procedure that the convention looked upon the Bill of Rights as more fundamental than the constitution."

    The story, however, is even more interesting. Green writes:

  • November 13, a committee of eighteen was appointed to prepare "a Bill of Rights, and Form of a Constitution for the Government of this State." ...Thomas Jones of this committee reported a constitution on December 6, and a Bill of Rights, December 12, 1776. Though the constitution had been reported first, the convention delayed its adoption until the Bill of Rights had been determined upon.

    Even though North Carolinians had been presented with a constitution first, they bypassed a vote on it until they could have a Bill of Rights in place. From the beginning, North Carolina's founders put protecting the rights of citizens first and foremost.

    This philosophy spilled over into the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787. During North Carolina's ratification convention for the federal constitution, North Carolinians made it clear they would not ratify the document until a Bill of Rights was added. By a vote of 184 to 83, North Carolina decided not to ratify or reject the constitution and provided a list of rights and suggested amendments for Americans. Many call the Hillsborough Convention "the great refusal." It was only after North Carolina was assured a declaration of rights would be added to the constitution that they ratified the U.S. Constitution in November 1789.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Film Production Resumes in North Carolina Grant Recipients To Spend $107 Million Amid COVID-19 Interruptions John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Gun Sales Soar in Swing States


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country
populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue

HbAD2

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top