Supreme Court Could Have Final Say on H.R. 1

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

91.07% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

8.04% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.89% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
112 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Supreme Court Could Have Final Say on H.R. 1

Published: Tuesday, June 29th, 2021 @ 2:45 pm
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

If Congress manages to approve the sweeping federal election takeover envisioned in H.R. 1, the U.S. Supreme Court should respond. Nathan Lewin explains why in a Federalist column.

If Congress were to enact such a sweeping law - replacing election laws in all states - it would be doomed by a constitutional principle even the most liberal justices of the Supreme Court have recently endorsed.
Copyright law provides the most recent precedent for invalidating H.R. 1. In 2019, the Supreme Court heard a challenge to a 1990 law eliminating the sovereign-immunity defense states had invoked if they were sued for copyright infringement. A photographer whose videos had been used by North Carolina without his permission sued the state, claiming the 1990 law removed its claim that it could not be held accountable in court for infringement.
A unanimous Supreme Court - including the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg - found the 1990 law unconstitutional because it was too broad. Justice Elena Kagan's opinion in Allen v. Cooper, issued on March 23, 2020, said the law violated the "congruence and proportionality" principle by which the Supreme Court has uniformly measured congressional legislation. The law "swept too far," she said, and its "indiscriminate scope" was "out of proportion" to any problem Congress was seeking to address.
Unlike H.R. 1, the 1990 copyright law was the subject of a congressional report, which the court still found inadequate to sustain the law because it cited "just two examples of patent infringement suits against the States."
"Congruence and proportionality" mean a law cannot be indiscriminately broad unless there is evidence such sweeping coverage is necessary. Congress may not displace a large area of local legislation, but must selectively address specific ills shown through legislative hearings and committee findings.
This "congruence and proportionality" standard was also the basis for a ruling in 2000 upholding state immunity from lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett.

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

User-Fee Principle Should Guide Future N.C. Transportation Choices

John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics

Funnel Cakes for All: ‘Science’ Favors State Fairs

Our Members

ENCN Sign Up

BCN Home

Beaufort Observer

Portfolios

Current Events: A Historical Perspective

Current Weather

Latest Comments

Latest Polls

Featured Entries

Latest Entries

Supreme Court Could Have Final Say on H.R. 1 | Eastern NC Now

Supreme Court Could Have Final Say on H.R. 1

Leave a Guest Comment

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

UK Rape Gang Report: 250,000 young British girls were victims of Muslim rape gangs

CA's Gov. Newsome facing federal investigation started under Biden, but blames Trump

student wins free speech case against Mecklenburg County NC Schools filed in federal court

GOP legislature passes NC Ratepayer Protection Act on electric rates

Taxes, Budgets, Spending, Are They Linked?

Overworked And Under Pressure Is Not A Path To Law And Order

UPDATE: Conservative Mike Collins wins Georgia GOP US Senate runoff

Biden DOJ targeted parents at school board meetings despite objections from FBI and sheriffs

Truth for our times: Bills Return America has addressed, the case made, and other legislation being monitored

Poland says "Hell, NO" to EU migrant resettlement scheme; Belfast anti-migrant riots continue

Tulsi Gabbard releases documents on US funded gain of function research at foreign labs

CEO of major Democrat funding group ActBlue pleads the 5th on election finance frauds

Creative new term limits bill introduced by Congressman Chip Roy with 12 year limit

What is the nuclear family and its significance in society?

The British police state: bill to jail tech CEOs who refuse to spy on everyone's cell phone

White House Doctor Announces Results Of Trump’s Annual Physical

Riots sweep Belfast after African migrant attempts to behead a local man in random attack

Illegal alien migrants behaving badly - migrants and crime NEWLY UPDATED

The JAIL Act: cracking down on soft-on-crime judges

new report: Minnesota Dems knew about mass Somali fraud but refused to do anything about it

Investigative reporter Nick Shirley finds 126 year old California voter,

UK top Labour leader says all ethnic groups should NOT be treated the same by police

EXCLUSIVE: State Department Organizing Global Push Against Far-Left Terror

Obama judge opens US immigration to migrants from 38 terrorist infected countries

Will California's crooked election system produce crooked results this year? Fed probe launched

It was my war

The ‘90s Childhood Comeback