Voting Rights Act Fuels Biden’s Attack on Georgia Voting Law | Eastern NC Now

Margot Cleveland of the Federalist explains how the Voting Rights Act plays into the Biden administration’s challenge against Georgia’s new voting law.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Margot Cleveland of the Federalist explains how the Voting Rights Act plays into the Biden administration's challenge against Georgia's new voting law.

  • On Friday, the Biden administration filed suit against Georgia, challenging numerous aspects of the state's Election Integrity Act of 2021. While many of the allegations contained in the nearly 50-page complaint struck a surreal chord, assessing the merits (or lack thereof) of the lawsuit requires an understanding of the Voting Rights Act. ...
  • ... As originally drafted, then, the Voting Rights Act only prohibited intentional discrimination. However, following the Supreme Court's decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden, wherein the high court held that Section 2 only bars "the purposefully discriminatory denial or abridgment by the government of the freedom to vote" on account of race or color, Congress amended the language of Section 2 to prohibit practices that "result[]" in the "denial or abridgment" of the right to vote.
  • To prevail on a Section 2 claim, then, the Department of Justice need not establish a state such as Georgia intended to deny or abridge the right to vote based on race or color. Rather, Section 2(b) provides that a violation "is established if, based on the totality of circumstances, it is shown that the political processes . . . are not equally open to participation" because members of a particular race or color "have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice."
  • Based on this statutory language, courts have developed a two-step analysis to determine if a practice violates Section 2. First, courts ask whether the practice provides members of a particular race or color "less opportunity" than others "to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice." Second, the burden must be "caused by or linked to 'social and historical conditions' that have or currently produce discrimination."

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Biden’s Penchant for Caving to Pressure John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Derek Bok’s Higher Expectations — Our Colleges Should Accomplish More


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."

HbAD2

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top