Greenville red-light camera complaint rejected by N.C. Supreme Court | Eastern North Carolina Now | The N.C. Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit challenging the Greenville red-light camera law as an unconstitutional local health act.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    The N.C. Supreme Court will not take up a lawsuit that claimed Greenville's red-light camera program was based on an unconstitutional local law dealing with health. The state's highest court dismissed the appeal without comment this week.

    Plaintiff Mary Sue Vaitovas had filed paperwork in April challenging the N.C. Court of Appeals' unanimous ruling against her.

    Before addressing the Vaitovas case, the state Supreme Court already agreed in March to block a separate Appeals Court ruling against Greenville's red-light program.

    Vaitovas' lawyers argued that she had raised a "substantial" constitutional question about the 2016 state law that permitted Greenville's red-light program.

    "The substantial constitutional question is whether N.C. Sess. Law 2016-64 unconstitutionally relates to health in violation of N.C. Const. Art. II, § 24(1)(a)," according to an April court filing.

    Article II, Section 24(1)(a) of the state constitution bans the General Assembly from enacting local legislation "relating to health, sanitation, and the abatement of nuisances."

    "[T]his issue has significant public interest and affects legal principles of major significance to the jurisprudence of the state," according to the appeal for Supreme Court review. "Respondents violated Vaitovas' rights under the North Carolina Constitution by enforcing the local act against her and depriving her of her property."

    Vaitovas "argues S.L. 2016-64 is a local act relating to health because its proponents described it as 'designed' to 'prevent injuries' and 'save lives,'" according to the document.

    The Court of Appeals noted that Vaitovas' original challenge focused only on a local act involving Greenville. It did not target underlying legislation permitting multiple local governments to enact red-light camera programs.

    "By requiring Vaitovas to challenge both S.L. 2016-64 and N.C.G.S. § 160A-300.1, the Court of Appeals decision leaves a procedural pothole in our State's jurisprudence," wrote Vaitovas' lawyers. "According to that court, simply challenging the particular application to Greenville (i.e., S.L. 2016-64) of N.C.G.S. § 160A-300.1 is no longer sufficient."

    "The lesson for a future plaintiff is clear: challenge the particular application and the general application, even if the more general statute (whether public or local) has not harmed the plaintiff. That lesson will expand the scope of constitutional challenges in North Carolina."

    While rejecting Vaitovas' plea, the Supreme Court already has stepped into the debate over Greenville's red-light cameras. On March 30, the court granted a temporary stay in a case that successfully challenged the program. In that case, Fearrington v. City of Greenville, the Appeals Court ruled the red-light program unconstitutional because of its funding scheme.

    Appellate judges ruled that Greenville's program did not provide enough money to Pitt County Schools. The Appeals Court said the Fines and Forfeitures Clause in Article IX, Section 7 of the state Constitution requires the schools to net at least 90% of proceeds of red-light camera citations. In Greenville's case, schools get less than 72% of the proceeds.

    Both Greenville and the Pitt County Schools asked the state Supreme Court for the temporary stay blocking the Appeals Court's ruling.

    The Apex-based Stam Law Firm represents plaintiffs in both cases. Attorney Paul "Skip" Stam is a member of the board of directors of the John Locke Foundation, which oversees Carolina Journal.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Whoopi Goldberg, a leftist co-host of ABC’s “The View,” argued on the show this week that God supports killing unborn babies via abortion.
New reports from Mar-a-Lago indicate that during Monday's raid, FBI agents searching the house ran quickly to see the safe only to find it empty with an angel of the Lord standing beside it.
A top lawyer for then-President Donald Trump tried to turn over the president’s records to the National Archives, but was reportedly blocked by Trump.
The N.C. Sheriffs’ Association is not taking the recent violence against deputies across the state lying down. After a seventh deputy was killed or injured by gunfire in a three-week period, they are offering an $100,000 reward for information that leads to the capture.
Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration is reportedly gathering data on an oil pipeline in Michigan to determine if shutting it down would further increase fuel prices in the region.


Researchers at Yale University are challenging the idea of irreversible cardiac death after new technology tested on pigs restored some of the animals’ heart and brain cells an hour after dying.
President Biden just solved the economy by creating thousands of IRS jobs! We know you've always dreamed of working for the IRS, but do you have what it takes?
Teach yourself to be disobedient to bad orders
Is the legacy media ever embarrassed or angry that it consistently gets fed false information — and repeats it verbatim — in order to push anti-conservative narratives, or does it enjoy being a mouthpiece for the government?
A U.S. federal appeals court issued a stay on Saturday temporarily halting Democrat President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate that would have required companies with at least 100 employees to get vaccinated for the coronavirus or be tested weekly.


After a critically acclaimed first season that was allegedly watched by some people, the producers of the January 6th Hearings have sadly confirmed that their star Liz Cheney will not be returning for season 2.


Back to Top