Charlotte asks N.C. Appeals Court to give recent rezoning ruling more value as precedent | Eastern North Carolina Now | Charlotte has asked the N.C. Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision not to publish a recent ruling in a rezoning fight.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Charlotte is asking the N.C. Court of Appeals to "publish" a recent opinion in a rezoning dispute. Publication would mean that the case could be used as a precedent in future court proceedings.

    The Appeals Court released a unanimous unpublished opinion in Mozeley v. City of Charlotte on Aug. 16.

    "The Mozeley opinion has significant value as legal precedent" in multiple ways, according to a motion filed Thursday by Thomas Powers, Charlotte's senior assistant city attorney.

    Plaintiff Steven Mozeley objected in 2020 to Charlotte's rezoning of an 80-acre plot next to his property, a single-family home on 15 acres of land. The rezoning would have changed the neighboring plot's maximum development from 240 single-family homes to 280 single-family, attached townhomes, according to court records.

    Charlotte City Council approved the rezoning in an online WebEx meeting. When Mozeley challenged the decision in court, his complaint included an argument that the city had violated its procedures for online meetings.

    A trial judge ruled against Mozeley in May 2021. The Appeals Court followed suit.

    The request for a published opinion cites the Appeals Court's analysis of Charlotte's online rezoning vote.

    "The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented response by the North Carolina General Assembly," Powers wrote. "It adopted Session Law 2020-3 and amended Chapter 166A of the North Carolina General Statutes to add 'remote meetings' authorization for all governmental agencies."

    Charlotte "could not find another North Carolina opinion addressing the requirements of open meetings laws when a governmental agency uses a video-conferencing platform (i.e., WebEx, Zoom, Microsoft Teams) to conduct public business," he added. "This opinion provides exceptional guidance that the 'remote meetings' law does not require the governmental agency to be able to see or have information as to the number of person[s] viewing online or to be aware of the size, scope, and intensity."

    Charlotte also highlights the Mozeley decision's approach to the plaintiff's "novel theory" about illegal spot zoning. "This opinion, as precedent, will guide future interactions between local governments and complaining parties over a rezoning that includes an option-to-purchase," Powers wrote.

    The case also helps Charlotte demonstrate that it did not make a zoning decision in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner, Powers explained. The disputed rezoning included a "consistency statement" explaining how the change complied with existing city plans.

    "This opinion adds value as precedent ... that Charlotte's rezoning process is complying with the statutory requirements for consistency statements," Powers wrote. "Otherwise, future plaintiffs will continue to ... assert that Defendant-Appellee City has failed to comply with its procedures for adopting consistency statements whereas this case demonstrates that Defendant-Appellee City is now complying with those same procedures."

    Charlotte believes the Mozeley case also offers value as a precedent for future cases in which a plaintiff might claim violations of the right to due process.

    Appeals Court judges can decide whether to publish an opinion or leave it unpublished.

    "In order to minimize the cost of publication and of providing storage space for the published reports, the Court of Appeals is not required to publish an opinion in every decided case," according to court Rule 30(e). "If the panel that hears the case determines that the appeal involves no new legal principles and that an opinion, if published, would have no value as a precedent, it may direct that no opinion be published."

    "An unpublished decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority," the rule states. "Accordingly, citation of unpublished opinions in briefs, memoranda, and oral arguments in the trial and appellate divisions is disfavored."

    Judge Jefferson Griffin wrote the opinion in Mozeley v. City of Charlotte. Judges Richard Dietz and Lucy Inman also served on the three-judge panel. Dietz and Inman are running against each other this fall for an open seat on the N.C. Supreme Court.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Cheri Beasley Sidesteps Stance on Student Loan Bailout Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Video Shows TX Troops Lock Private Fence Stopping Illegals From Entering U.S., Biden’s Feds Open It: Report


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

More sever penalties for those who profit from drugs are needed
Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon revealed that the Christian satire outlet ultimately gained a broader audience by refusing to delete a post that caused the former management of Twitter to shutter its account.
The United States' soccer match against England ended in a tie, handing the U.S. team victory as the country which last beat the other in a war wins the tiebreaker.
The Biden administration is close to granting a license to Chevron to resume pumping oil in Venezuela, following previous reporting that President Joe Biden would ease sanctions on the socialist country to allow the U.S. oil company to continue production.
As inflation comes home to roost for many American families preparing to celebrate Thanksgiving, leadership at one of the largest poultry producers in the nation is denying that households will shift from turkey to other alternatives.
N.C. State Treasurer Dale Folwell discussed issues surrounding several towns in the state Tuesday during his monthly “Ask Me Anything” virtual press conference.


Elon Musk may release information on Twitter’s internal discussions regarding censorship of stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop prior to the 2020 election, the newly-established CEO suggested Wednesday.
A new Civitas Poll of North Carolina parents has new information on their views of teachers and what is happening in the classroom
Disney fired CEO Bob Chapek in a dramatic development Sunday, bringing back its former boss and ending a disastrous tenure that saw the entertainment giant become a value-hemorrhaging caricature of wokeness.
A local retailer is making waves after announcing its most dramatic Black Friday sale ever, in which every item in the store is marked down to whatever the price was before Biden became President.
Readers know that when you watch CBS News, much of what you see is spin, but a report regarding Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop from the legacy media network on Monday really takes the cake.
Famed author Salman Rushdie lost the use of one hand and an eye after an attack in August by a man who stormed the stage and stabbed him in the neck and torso several times — his agent confirmed last week.


Cooper makes state personnel office like Soviet political commissars


Back to Top