HB 18: Nanny State is the Real Burning Issue | Eastern NC Now

Known as the Youth Skin Cancer Prevention Act, HB 18 would require all North Carolinians under 18 years of age to have a written prescription from a doctor in order to use a tanning bed, essentially banning all minors from indoor tanning.

ENCNow
   Publisher's note: This post, by Jacob Parson, was originally published in the Bad Bill of the Week section of Civitas's online edition.

    This week's "Bad Bill of the Week" is HB 18. Known as the Youth Skin Cancer Prevention Act, HB 18 would require all North Carolinians under 18 years of age to have a written prescription from a doctor in order to use a tanning bed, essentially banning all minors from indoor tanning. Though similar legislation has been tried before, this incarnation of the bill is sponsored by Representatives Mark Hollo (R-Alexander), Jim Fulghum M.D. (R-Wake), D. Craig Horn (R-Union), and Tom Murry (R-Wake).

    The bill gets tricky because its stated goal is understandable. After all, North Carolinians should be concerned about the health of the state's younger generations and whether they will get skin cancer. However, HB 18 goes awry when it cuts the parents out of the overall decision-making process.

    In a manner somewhat reminiscent of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's soda ban, HB 18 does not help families make more informed health decisions but instead makes it for them. While the risks associated with indoor tanning are well documented, older teens and their parents are very capable of making decisions without the government serving as their nanny. Quite simply, this is another case of someone in the government trying to get involved in families' day-to-day health decisions.

    As always, the unintended consequences of legislation must also be considered. If teens desperate for a summer tan suddenly find themselves without access to indoor tanning, where will they obviously turn next? Outside. Would the Youth Skin Cancer Prevention Act really prevent youth skin cancer at all if it only encouraged teens to get tanned/sunburned outside? Probably not. What's next? Criminalizing sunburns? Age requirements to legally tan by the pool in your backyard? The General Assembly should just leave the parenting to the parents.

    At the end of the day the Youth Skin Cancer Prevention Act ignores the role of family in basic health decisions, assumes the government is better situated than its citizens to decide what is healthy and ignores obvious unintended consequences. This makes HB 18 this week's "Bad Bill of the Week."
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




IdeaFest Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Overdosing on Government


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

as RINO incumbents Cornyn in Texas and Cassidy in Louisiana trail in the polls
government's offer is rejected, the battle continues, no confidence vote in parliament

HbAD1

Understanding how parties work is important for making informed decisions regarding elected officials.
Tax Day is a week away, and the reports are in: North Carolinians are winning big with record-setting tax returns thanks to President Trump and Republicans' Working Families Tax Cuts.

HbAD2

“It is a trust fund, a piece of the American economy for every child that they will be able to take out when they are 18.”
farmers, truckers and supporters block roads, fuel deports, and ports to protest climate taxes on fuel
Sunrise Movement which focuses on climate alarmist is now engaged with illegal immigration
a typical lying Democrat, she told voters she was a moderate, and then went hard left
Change in schedule for executive committee meeting. Meeting Thursday April 9 is cancelled.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top