DoD Directive 5240.01: The stealth expansion of military intelligence powers | Eastern North Carolina Now

lethal force against U.S. citizens in certain circumstances

ENCNow

The reissuance of DoD Directive 5240.01 repealed previous versions, including the 1982 DoD 5240.1-R. While the update might seem routine, the changes regarding the use of lethal force in domestic operations are significant.

In the 2016 version, the directive primarily focused on intelligence collection and ensuring civil liberties protections for U.S. persons. It emphasized strict oversight and the need for authorization before collecting U.S. person information.

However, the 2024 version expands the military's role, particularly in assisting civil law enforcement, and authorizes lethal force under specific conditions, raising questions about its use during potential civil unrest surrounding the election.

The Differences Between the 2016 and 2024 Versions
1. Focus of the 2016 Version
The 2016 version of the directive did not mention the use of lethal force. Instead, it focused on:

Civil liberties protections: Ensuring strict oversight for operations involving U.S. citizens.
Intelligence collection restrictions: Limiting when and how U.S. person's information (USPI) could be collected.
Privacy safeguards: Protecting privacy rights and preventing unauthorized data collection.
The 2016 directive centered around intelligence gathering, with no mention of lethal force.

2. New Provisions in the 2024 Version
The 2024 update introduces a dramatic shift, particularly regarding domestic operations. Section 3.3.a.(2)(c) now explicitly permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies, provided the action complies with legal oversight, specifically DoDD 5210.56, which governs the use of deadly force by DoD personnel.

Key updates include:

Use of lethal force: The directive allows military intelligence components to assist law enforcement in operations that involve lethal force.
Conditions for force: The directive specifies lethal force can be used under conditions involving imminent threats.
Legal oversight: Any use of lethal force must comply with DoDD 5210.56, ensuring proper legal frameworks are followed.

DoD Directive 5240.01: The Stealth Expansion of Military Intelligence Powers in Life-or-Death Domestic Scenarios


Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )



Comments

( October 22nd, 2024 @ 2:59 pm )
 
It is the Democrats who have politicized the military. First, Obama systematically retired conservative generals and admirals and promoted wokesters. Now Biden has put DEI officers in the military, which is just like the old political officers of the old Soviet Red Army. That is the sickness in our military, and Trump will put an end to it.
Big Bob said:
( October 22nd, 2024 @ 12:32 pm )
 
Not the NG. The military, motivated by politics.
The man is sick.
( October 22nd, 2024 @ 11:24 am )
 
Our military does need to be deployed on the southern border, and doing more than just babysitting for the border patrol. Several European countries use their military on the border to stop illegal aliens entering. We should do so, too.
( October 22nd, 2024 @ 10:56 am )
 
Bush expanded the domestic intelligence functions of the FBI, but it was under Obama that this was turned into a political weapon and it was first used against Trump. Now, Biden-Harris are trying to do the same with military intelligence.
( October 22nd, 2024 @ 10:42 am )
 
Trump offered to use the National Goard to protect the Capitol on January 6 and it was Pelosi and the Democrats who turned that down.

Where we need our military is on the southern border, and with robust rules of exgagement against illegal alien invaders.
Big Bob said:
( October 22nd, 2024 @ 9:50 am )
 
Trump has already said he approves using the military on American soil against American citizens.
Thanks for bringing this up.



Bidenomics fail: Leading Economic Indicators fall more than expected Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics Kamala Harris does fake "Town Hall" with scripted questions


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.
would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."

HbAD1

Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2

faced 25 years in prison for "misgendering" a leftie tranny politician
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
It was a clear beautiful, royal blue sky day on Wall Street. The S & P futures were up markedly, awaiting a positive open, as I turn to get my first cup of coffee. I return to CNBC to get the morning business news, when I notice that the S & P futures are falling, and they're falling fast.
conservative youth leader was victim of political assassination
Harvard University is once again sending its students on delegations to China

HbAD3

 
Back to Top