![]() |
Commented on The greatest threat to our public schools in NCNot today's NC Democrats, Bob. The three running statewide I mentioned earlier are as far left as any Democrat in America. Yes, it was different when we had NC Democrats like Senator B. Everett Jordan, Senator Sam Ervin, Governor Dan Moore, Lt. Govenor Jimmy Green, Congressman L. H. Fountain, State Senator Vernon White, State Senator Julian Allsbrook, and others like them, but all of them are gone and there are no longer others like them in today's leftwing NC Democrat Party. That was then, but his is now. The old conservative Democrats and business Democrats voted with their feet years ago, the latter now often becoming Chamber of Commerce Republicans.
Commented: Monday, August 5th, 2024 @ 7:27 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on The greatest threat to our public schools in NCNC Democrats went pretty far to the left decades ago with elected officials like Terry Sanford and Jim Hunt, but nothing like their ultra-liberal canddiates today. You are clueless, Bob, or in denial.
The Democrat statewide ticket this years is really far to the left. For Superintendand of Public Insttuction their nominee was once the head of the far left Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, the money bags for left and far-left causes in North Carolina. For Commissioner of Labor their candidate was a leader of the BLM/ANTIFA riots in Charlotte, and there is a photo of him leading a mob confronting a line of police with his fist in the air, no shirt, and his pants pulled half way down his ass exposing his underware (jailhouse style). The Democrat candidate for Supreme Court has never worked in a law firm or public legal offfice such as a prosecutor, and her only legal experience before being appointed by Cooper as a judge was being a lawyer for the radical far left Southern Coalition for Social Justice out of Durham. The NC Democrats are giving Vladimir Lenin a run for his money in terms of how far to the left they are.
Commented: Monday, August 5th, 2024 @ 10:40 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on The greatest threat to our public schools in NCA liberal political agenda of "woke" from the ultra liberal mostly Roy Cooper appointed state board of educaiton and from DPI is a big factor driving parents to take their children out of public schools and place them in private schools or home school. A poll last year by the Locke Foundation found that 71% of North Carolina parents are concerned about political indoctrination of their children in the public schools. Local school systems best approach to retain students is to take firm control of curriculum, tell the wokesters in Raleigh to get stuffed, eliminate the woke while bringing back quality. That, in addition to being firm on discipline, would create public schools that parents want to send their children to.
Commented: Sunday, August 4th, 2024 @ 12:03 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Biden-Harris are trying to force girls sports into allowing biological men to compete. They did this by imposing Title IX rules on schools and colleges that take federal money. Those rules stand Title IX as passed by Congress on its head. What Congress passed protects women's rights in education indluding in sports programs. The Biden-Harris rewrite, which they did NOT send to Congress ended that protection and instead protects "gender identity" and "sexual orientation". Their deadline to force this on schools was August 1, today.
Biden and Harris are all in on seeing what happened to that Italian woman boxer happen to high school kids all across America. We have already had one NC high school female athete paralyzed by having to play a biological male who claimed he was really a female because a local school system went along with this even before the Biden-Harris rule. Twenty six states have sued the Biden-Harris administration over this travesty and most of them have already gotten restraining orders from federal courts stopping it in their states. However, ultra liberal NC Attorney General Josh Stein (who is also Democrat candidate for governor of NC this year) has refused to file a lawsuit to protect NC's girls. Stein is all-in on this radical Biden-Harris policy. DPI and the state education hierachy seems to have no problem with boys in girls sports or boys in girls locker rooms and restrooms and are pushing counties to knuckle under. The Beaufort County school board has delayed voting on whether to knuckle under until its meeting in late August. Title IX as passed by Congress was designed to protect womens rights, but the Biden-Harris exeuctive rewrite, without Congress, does just the opposite.
Commented: Thursday, August 1st, 2024 @ 2:27 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Biden and Harris are trying to castrate one of the three co-equal branches of government, the Supreme Court and court system. That is a dictatorial move, just as it was in Venezuela.
The recent decision that has really sent the big government politicians into a tantrum was the Supreme Court's reversing the Chevron doctrine. A previous court decision had given way to much power to the executive branch when it constrained the checks and balances in our Constitutional system by adopting the Chevron doctrine that gave a one-sided deference to the executive branch in rulemaking. That the court has now restored Constitutional checks and balances as they were intended by our founding fathers is widely opposed by those who want a powerful, dictatorial executive branch. The Supreme Court did the right think for our country and for democracy, and now the anti-democratic politicians like Biden and Harris are trying to gut the Supreme Court. What they are doing is an attack on democracy and on our Constitutional Republic.
Commented: Wednesday, July 31st, 2024 @ 9:07 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
After the debacle of the electronic voting machines in the Puerto Rico primary this year, every state, territory, and country ought to be ditching ALL brands of electrronic voting machines.
Commented: Tuesday, July 30th, 2024 @ 1:41 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Policy is what is important, not personality, in the 2024 race. The Democrats and their media allies have generated a lot of personal political hate against Trump, and that atmosphere they created led to the assassination attempt.
Anyone looking at this race logically will look at the records and compare them. Trump had a great record of success while for Biden-Harris it has been failure on top of failure. Trump is also a lot more mainstream, while Harris is far out loony left.
Commented: Sunday, July 28th, 2024 @ 11:04 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on American Education: Public, Popular, and PolarizingAs someone who has been certified as an international election observer in multiple foreign elections, if I had been observing the 2020 US election, there are numerous aspects that would raise very serious questions about whether it was free and fair which I would have noted in my report. Those situations warranted thorough investigation. Unfortunately, US courts were gunshy in the extreme and did not let any of those issues even get to the discovery phase to examine evidence. US courts have a history of being overly reluctant to allow election challenges when compared to European courts. That is a serious flaw in American democracy.
Commented: Friday, July 26th, 2024 @ 9:18 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Boards abandon governing to the bureaucratsHaving been involved in Republican politics in North Carolina for over half a century, I have seen some nasty personality fights, but few as ugly as the current one in Beaufort County. We had one here back in the late 70s and early 80s between the Wilkinson and Ratcliff factions, but in those days, while we might have a knock down battle over party officers at the county comvention, once that was over with, both sides got back to the business of beating Democrats. Now, we have a few people on both sides of the divide who let personality conflicts obscure the need to achieve our policy goals.
In politics, policy should always trump personality. Accomplishing our policy goals, not battering those we may not personally like, is what is important. This year, when our country faces an existential threat from the far left, that is particularly crucial. When it comes to the relationship between the policy makers put in place by the voters, and the careerists in government, I had five years of experience with that during my time as a policy-level political appointee in the Jim Martin administration. I found that each careerist I dealt with had to be evaluated individually. You could not put them all in one box. Some were straightforward, objective, and understood they were not the policymakers. They were easy to work with and their opinions carried a lot more weight with those of us who were engaged at the policy level. Others were full of their own importance and wanted to engage in policy making even if it was not their role. These were the ones that those of us at the policy level had to keep a close eye on and could not turn our backs to. Some were somewhere in between. Unlike state government, where the governor could not be everywhere and had to rely on policy level political appointees, in local government, there is a much clearer distinction, with the elected policymakers in direct contact with the careerists hired to carry out that policy. In the public education context, I well remember a comment at a local political meeting I attended during my first year in law school from State Senator Dick Deeb (R-Pinellas) when a local education issue was being discussed. senator Deeb observed that "there are too many school board members who seem to think that the superintendant is their boss instead of their employee." As I have heard of school controversies here in North Carolina, I have concluded that is a problem in many school systems. Concern about the "woke" agenda in our schools has been massive all over the country, with a huge wave of voters defeating school board members aligned with the liberal education establishment and replacing them with conservative education reformers. This wave has reached into higher office and is largely responsible for carrying Virginia Governor Youngkin into office. Here in North Carolina, our Lt. Governr Mark Robinson, now our nominee for governor, has been heavily and publicly engaged in fighting the liberal education establishment, and he will undoubtedly continue that battle as governor. Our runner up in the primary, State Treasurer Dale Folwell, has also been engaged on that issue, standing with Robinson. It is up to all Republicans to understand where the battlelines are drawn and on which side our party stands. Personality conflicts do not mean doodly squat. It is the policy issues that are vital. In a poll last year, 71% of North Carolinians expressed concern about the political indoctrination of their children in the public schools. We must stand with those parents against the "woke" agenda.
Commented: Thursday, July 25th, 2024 @ 11:52 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on American Education: Public, Popular, and PolarizingA poll here in North Carolina last year showed that 71% of parents are concerned about political indoctrination in the classroom in our public schools. The key battle here is on curriculum, which our GOP Lt. Governor Mark Robinson has fought very hard on at the state level but it has been hard to get the attention of our local school board majority.
I like the British public school statutes that prohibit teachers from covering a politically contested topic unless they fairly present both sides. The last Conservative government in the UK used this law to shut down propagandizing CRT. Also, in a court case about students being shown Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth", the British High Court ruled that it is a propaganda film with multiple misstatements of fact and ordered that it not be shown to school children without disclaimers of those things.
Commented: Wednesday, July 24th, 2024 @ 9:10 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Harris cannot beat Trump. Here's whyOur system has been based on two parties that respect democratic values. When one refuses to operate by democratic norms within its own organization, it is a danger to the country because it is likely to run the country the very same way.
I an a conservative Reagan Republican who supported Ted Cruz as long as he was running in 2016, and leaned to deSantis in the beginning in 2024, although also comfortable with Trump and Scott.
Commented: Monday, July 22nd, 2024 @ 5:55 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Harris cannot beat Trump. Here's whyThe real issue is within a party, who makes the ultimate decision, the elites or the grassroots. While elites have too much sway in both parties, in the Democrat Party they have almost total control, and the Biden ambush is only the latest example.
All across the country, grassroots voters went to the polls in primaries or turned out in precinct meetings to choose their party's presidential candidates. The Republican Party is honoring the choice of the grassroots. The Democrats have forced the choice of their grassroots out of the nomination, and instead the elites will select a replacement nominee. Even at primary time, the Democrats were boxing in their grassroots voters by making it difficult for anyone but Biden to compete. The whole process was rigged against grassroots voters on the Democrat side. The Democrat Party has another trick up its sleave to give the party elites extra weight, the "superdelegates". In contrast, in the Republican Party, the elites have to run for delegate slots like anyone else. Heck, one year in North Carolina, we had a sitting governor seek a seat as a national delegate and was defeated for that seat. Even some of the Democrat leaders of the coup against Biden are admitting that they thwarted democracy for political purposes, like Adam Schiff. redstate.com
Commented: Monday, July 22nd, 2024 @ 2:51 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
I was hoping for a more traditional Reagan style conservative, and Dr. Ben Carson was my first choice from the shortlist. Trump avoided the pick from that list that would have caused heartburn in the base, Coug Bergum.
I understand the political logic of J. D. Vance. He appeals to the swing states of the rust belt like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota, where the election will be won or lost. His connections in the world of finance offer great fundraising opportunities. Finally, after last Saturday, of all the shortlist, Vance probably best offers assassination insurance, list Kamala Harris has for Biden. Thinking logically from a political perspective, he is probably who trump should have picked.
Commented: Thursday, July 18th, 2024 @ 11:31 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Biden is on the same anti-free speech path here in the US. He has been called the most anti-free speech president since John Adama, who was known for his Alien and Sedition Act", by renowned George Washington Univerity Law Professor Jonathan Turley. The way to make a stand for free speech in November is to make sure we elect Donald Trump and a Republican Congress, both House and Senate.
Commented: Wednesday, July 17th, 2024 @ 2:30 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Trump shot. Minor injury. Assassin shot dead by LEO.One of the elected Democrats who made a comment about killing Trump was a Congresswoman. I would look up the article, Bob, and give you the link to it. but I note you don't like links to articles that refute your narrative.
Commented: Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 @ 8:35 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Trump shot. Minor injury. Assassin shot dead by LEO.Just a few weeks ago after the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, there was a lot of loose, ugly, and disgusting talk by liberals, including some elected Democrats, involving someone killing Trump. Just a few weeks later, someone actually tried to do it. The Biden Democrats and the far left own this.
Commented: Monday, July 15th, 2024 @ 5:05 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
That analysis by Blackwater's founder of the Secret Service mishandling of the security for the Trump rally in Pennsylvania is just devastating. I suspect they will be having to answer a lot of questions from Congress.
Commented: Sunday, July 14th, 2024 @ 9:07 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on Foreign leaders blame media and politician demonization of Trump for assassination attemptThank you for pointing out a recent example of demonization of conservatives, Bob. Plans for new administrations to hit the ground running to implement their policies are something that is done for every new administration, state or federal, Republican or Democrat. For Team Biden to present the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 as anything unusual or sinister is just complete malarky. This planning is always done by the official campaign and usually by one or more sympathetic think tanks or policy groups as well. The Heritage Foundation is a well respected and long established conservative policy organization staffed by Reagan-style Republicans. They are not always on the exact same wavelength as Trump, who is more of a populist, but they are usually close.
I am personally aware of how these things work in a transition between administrations of different parties, having been through one at the state level between Republican Governor Jim Martin who I worked for as a political appointee and that of Democrat Jim Hunt. I saw both sides of it because, while the Hunt people originally told us that the top 6 political appointees (out of about 100 political appointees in an 18,000 employee department), of which I was one as the deparment's General Counsel had our last day on Governor Martin's last day in office, that changed because 1) Hunt did not have a replacement selected for my position, and 2) there were four very serious issues hanging where the two administrations were in agreement, but could not be left unattended. So for two months, until my replacement was selected and came on board, they kept me on as a consultant to ride herd on those issues. Prior to the end of the Martin administration, we saw a lot of the official Hunt transition people asking questions and taking stock of things to make their plans to implement their policies. After Hunt took over, however, even in my limited capacity in the department, I became aware that there were also at least two plans from outside liberal groups that the Hunt people were also weighing and sometimes they disagreed with the original internal planning, so some changes got made. Both of the outside plans addressed one of the issues I was riding herd on differently than their internal plan and there was some uncertainly for a couple of weeks as to which way they would end up going. Ultimately they stuck with their own internal plan on that item. In short, plans for new administrations like Project 2025 are not at all unusual in government. What is unusual is somebody trying to demonize them for political purposes. But that seems par for the course with the Biden Democrats.
Commented: Sunday, July 14th, 2024 @ 8:57 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on What they aren’t telling you about France.Get out the popcorn, France's government is going to be a train wreck. France is the new Greece. Macron's spending has already had France called on the carpet by EU authorities for violating its agreements when the euro was created by building up debt far beyond its GNP. Now the far left NPF thinks it rules the roost and wants much, much higher spending. The country's well to do are widely discussing fleeing the country and its taxman (in Europe, you are taxed where you live, not by your citizenship). Macron's Ensemble took a major beating in the elections and is a spent force. He, himself, is a lame duck who is termed out. His prime minister has resigned, but Macron has not accepted his resignation.
If I were Marine LePen, I would be thinking about throwing Macron a lifeline, with conditions attached. She has a real opportunity here to make the far left the major political monster and give her own party an image of putting the country ahead of politics. I would exchange backing Macron's prime minister in a confidence vote for some concessions from Macron on toughening immigration. What that does for the next parliamentary election is create an image for Macron voters that National Rally is their friend and NPF is their enemy. With the French system, positioning for the runoffs is critical. Even with help from a few snall leftwing parties, the NPF can only muster about 200 votes in parliament out of 577. The National Rally represents the only force that could come to Macron's assistance to block the NPF. Even if Macron will not do a deal, LePen could get a lot of milage by announcing that her party was putting France first ahead of its own interests, and would cast its votes in parliament in a way to keep Macron's prime minister in power, whether by abstaining or voting for him, as long as he did not adopt the radical policies of the far left NPF. She could do that unilaterally and it would offer almost the same benefit to her party and to France as an actual deal with Macron.
Commented: Wednesday, July 10th, 2024 @ 9:57 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on What they aren’t telling you about France.The National Rally (which the far left falsely calls "far right") made the biggest gain of seats by any party or grouping, both in absolute terms, and even more so in percentage terms. The also had a massive increase in vote share, while both the far left NPF and the Macron coaltion lost vote share in the second round compared to their vote in the second round of the last parliamentary election. The National Rally received millions more votes than either of their major rivals.
By all standards, the National Rally made major gains in this election, while Macron's Ensemble had major losses in both seats and vote share from the last election for parliament. Ensemble lost over a third of the seats it had held in the outgoing parliament. The NPF saw little change in vote share, although it was actually down in the second round, but they benefited from their deal with the devil with Macron as to seats won. In short, Macron's Ensemble had major losses of seats, while the National Rally and New Popular Front had major gains. The National Rally got their gains from the voters. The NPF got there's from a backroom deal with Macron. It was Macron's party that was the big loser in this election.
Commented: Tuesday, July 9th, 2024 @ 7:45 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
The problem is that American courts are far more reluctant to get into correcting abuses in the election process than in some other countries, and the Democrats take advantage of that.
Commented: Tuesday, July 9th, 2024 @ 7:21 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Wrong, Bob. America has never seen the level of institutionalized election corruption that we saw from the Democrats in 2020, much of it orchestrated by weakening election intergrity standards in the series of Marc Elias lawsuits.
In North Carolina, the one incident you can point to for a Reputlican is the ballot harvesting by Monroe Dallas in Bladen County in 2018. Dallas was a longtime operative for Democrat ballot harvesting who in one election went to work for a Republican congressional candidate. The Democrats then used that to force a rerun of that election. Most of the liberal media kept their blinders on and only reported on his activities in 2018. One media outlet, however, WBTV in Charlotte assigned an objective investigative journalist to the issue, and his reports that they broadcast covered the whole scope of what was going on in southeastern NC, including that Democrats were also running a ballot harvesting operation in Bladen County in 2018, and Democrats alone were running ballot harvesting operations in Robeson and Columbus counties. In fact, there was more ballot harvesting going on in Robeson County, all for the Democrats than total ballot harvesting in the other two counties combined. The Democrat controlled state Board of Elections swept everything the Democrats were doing in that election under the rug, but WBTV got the word out in public at least in their viewing area. Only 10-15% of the 2018 ballot harvesting in that Congressional race was for the Republican. The rest of it was for the Democrat, but most statewide media ignored that. Cudos to WBTV, one of the few honest media outlets in the state. Ballot harvesting in southeastern NC also came up in the recount of the 2016 gubenatorial race. There was a write in candidate in one of those counties, and during the hand recount, it was noted that the write in candidate's name was written in the same distinctive handwriting and in a unique color of ink on a large number of ballots. Those ballots were also voted for all Democrats, including for governor, in the other races. This was a clear indication of ballot harvesting by Democrats in 2016 in the same part of the state. In the later half of the last century, Republicans in North Carolina never had the sort of county level ruthless political machines like the Ponder machine in Madison County, the Sonny Boy Joyner machine in Northhampton County, the DCNA machine in Durham County, the Griffin machine in Martin County or other similar county level political machines. The DCNA machine stole a congressional race in the old 4th district in 1972 which I helped investigate, and it still does its dirty work today under a similar but different name. I don't think you can ever cite a case of Republicans voting illegal aliens, but it seems a common practice of Democrats.
Commented: Saturday, July 6th, 2024 @ 4:36 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
The story of why it happened is at least as interesting as the result, and after all the result was baked in the cake now for weeks. I think I even remember seeing what was certain to happen mentioned on this site days or weeks ago.
The gist of it is that while Boris Johnson was driving, Rishi Sunak pushed him out of the drivers seat and grabbed the wheel, then drove the party into the ditch. It is deja vu of when John Major pushed Margaret Thatcher out of the drivers seat, greabbed the wheel and drove the party into the ditch a few decades ago. That should have been a learning experience but clearly wasn't. As to the future leadership of the Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, a dynamic well spoken small "c" Conservative black female MP, appears to be the frontrunner, and the party grassroots is loudly demanding a say in the process this time. www.dailymail.co.uk
Commented: Friday, July 5th, 2024 @ 7:04 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
A former British colleague I had worked with in Europe who had held roles in the UK Conservative Party much of his life told me before the election that he expected this result. Rishi Sunak had lost the confidence of the party base and they had Reform nipping at their heels from the right. I see in the British newspapers that at the latest count, Reform had picked up a fifth seat.
This election was more a referendum on Rishi Sunak than anything else, and he was not very well liked even within his own party. I see Boris Johnson now has a plan to revive the Conservative Party, but its way forward is still uncertain until new leadership is selected. This election has many similarities to John Major's race after he ousted Margaret Thatcher in a palace coup in the middle of her term, and then went down to resounding defeat in the next election. Rishi Sunak stabbed Boris Johnson in the back to take his job, and had the same result at the next general election. Both Major and Sunak were Tory "wets" (less conservative and more opportunistic) but their main reason to oust the sitting prime minister in both cases was personal ambition. Thatcher and Johnson were both small"c" Conservatives who had led their party to major victories, only to see themselves ousted, replaced by weak leaders, and the party go down to defeat the next election. In Sunak's case, he particularly alienated the party base by the way he went about his power play. After stabbing Boris Johnson in the back and causing his ouster, the party had a two step process to choose a new prime minister. First parliament reduced the choices to two in a series of votes and then all party members cast a ballot between those two. Sunak was the top choice of the parliament caucus, but lost by a wide margin to Liz Truss among party members. Sunak then set about undermining Truss and bringing her down. Truss was another snall "c" Conservative. Sunak then managed to change the procedure to elimintate the party members voting on the replacement, so he won with only the parliament caucus. That created a lot of bitterness among party activists which has lingered since and made Reform more attractive. Boris Johnson may be the Conservative Party's only hope of getting back on its feet. Johnson has also had an ability to work things out with Farage in the past. If the new leadership is another "wet" then look for the party to be replaced by the Reform Party.
Commented: Friday, July 5th, 2024 @ 4:03 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
There is very good reason to be concerned that the left is working to illegally register illegal aliens to vote in North Carolina and elsewhere. A woman from southeastern NC who is active in a voter integrity group I participate in, for example, reported suspicions when a Catholic Church in her area announced a voter registration program after church and the group holding it was a "non-partisan" but very leftwing group. It seemed unlikely that they would be trying to register more pro-life voters, but many Catholic churches have outreach programs to migrants from Catholic countries in Latin America. It turns out that was exactly who they were after. With knowledge ahead of time, monitors could be sent in to oversee what was going on and make it difficult for them to register non-citizens. This is the sort of thing that needs to be watched for, and monitors sent in when it is discovered.
One thing that is really needed is to go back to the system of voter registration being conducted in person before appropriate officials. Improper voter registration is just too easy with mail in forms or even worse, online voter registration.
Commented: Friday, July 5th, 2024 @ 7:43 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
"Trump is going to win the election and democracy will be just fine" wrote Democrat Congressman Jared Golden (D-Maine) in an op-ed column for a Maine newspaper after the debate. I agree with him.
Commented: Wednesday, July 3rd, 2024 @ 9:17 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Commented on While few were looking, Supreme Court drops a bomb on how the Federal Government operatesThis is a huge blow for freedom against the bureaucratic administrative state, or as some say, the deep state. It offers a great opportunity for the next Trump administration to easily wipe out many of the liberal initiatives of Biden and Obama which were done by exeucutive fiat.
Commented: Sunday, June 30th, 2024 @ 4:00 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
This election cycle, it has been the Biden wing of the Democrat Party that has manipulated the process to try to exercise control, which is contrary to actual democracy. They changed the primary schedule to benefit Biden, bumping aside New Hampshire and Iowa because Robert Kennedy may have too much of a chance there and replaced them with a state they knew Biden would carry, South Carolina. Then they made it hard for any candidate other than Biden to qualify for the primary ballot. North Carolina was one of those states where the Democrats offered a Soviet style ballot with only one choice, Biden, even though other Democrats were actively campaigning. They rigged their own nomination process so blatantly that lifelong Democrat Robert Kennedy, from a major Democrat dynasty, had to bail out and run as an independent. What Democrats have done to their own nomination process is the antithesis of democracy.
Now some of the elite want to force Biden out and have a new nominee picked in a smoke filled room, where the pubic has no say in primaries. They even want to kick aside the number two on their team, Kamala Harris. One Democrat was reported as calling this a "soft coup" and an unprecedented very early debate may have been calculated for that very purpose. If they do this, they will have fully Sovietized their nomination process and Americans should run, not walk, away from the Democrat Party.
Commented: Sunday, June 30th, 2024 @ 3:52 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Polling in an election like France's is tricky but these pollsters know the system and must have some confidence in their results. The two round system is what makes it complicated. A candidate must win over 50% to be elected in the first round, and there are a limited number of "safe seats" where that is possible. For the majority of seats, the two top finishers will face each other in a runoff a week later. Those pairings will be important. Where it is National Rally against the far left coalition, the National Rally will be heavily favored, but if it is National Rally against Les Republicains, the trend would be much more to Les Republicains. In the second round, voters whose own parties have been eliminated will mostly be voting what they see as the lesser of the evils or sometimes just staying home. The pollsters will certainly have polled second preferences of voters, something we used to do in our polls when I was advising pro-western parties in Moldova, even though Moldova did not have runoffs for its parliament.
Commented: Saturday, June 29th, 2024 @ 9:18 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
The GOP county commissioner who wrote a campaign check to the Democrat nominee for sheriff in 2022 and resigned when he was asked to from the county GOP executive committee is not running in the 2024 election. His seat comes up again in 2026.
Van Zant may be confusing him with Tandy Dunn who is running this year for commissioner and never gave any campaign contributions to that Democrat sheriff candidate. Dunn was involuntarily removed from the executive committee after he picked up his wife, who is a close relative of that Democrat sheriff candidate from a fundraiser. Dunn argued that he was supporting the Republican sheriff candidates and had campaign signs up for Republican Scott Hammonds on his property, and only went inside the building where the fundraiser was held to find his wife to give her a ride home. Dunn appealed his removal to the NCGOP Aribration Committee, which held a hearing and unanimously ruled that Dunn should not have been removed. I think he is confusing two different county commission candidates. Supporting a Democrat is grounds for removal from Republican Party offices, but it was determined that Dunn going in that function toward its end to pick up his wife did not amount to supporting a Democrat. Writing a check to a Democrat, however, clearly does.
Commented: Saturday, June 29th, 2024 @ 9:58 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
This creates a real easy way to get rid of Biden and even Obama federal rules that push the liberal agenda. It might be tempting to just issue executive orders declaring them void because the were passed without real statutory authority. A better way would be to use the "sue and settle" approach often used by the liberals. A conservative group files a lawsuit someshere challenging a set of rules on the basis of this new Supreme Court ruling. The new Trump Justice Department then settles the case agreeing that the rules had no legitimate statutory basis. Both parties agree on a consent judgment finding the rules illegally adopted and void nationally. Once the judge signs it, those rules are history.
Commented: Saturday, June 29th, 2024 @ 9:09 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
That Supreme Court decision against free speech is not quite as bad as it seems in some of the media coverge, although it was a major betrayal by some Trump appointees that was shocking. The court did not rule on the merits of the case just on what is called "stanading" meaning the right of plaintiffs to file a lawsuit. What it means is that the case is being sent back to the federal district court for a hearing on standing and then has to go back through the process again, which will take well over a year to reach the Supreme Court again.
This was a cop out. The SCOTUS should have just affirmed the excellent opinion from the Circuit Court of Appeals. Now there are no constraints on the Biden regime monkeying around with censorship during this presidential election. Amy Barrett was a particular disappointment. She wrote the cop out decision of the court, and even used the lefty weasel words "content moderation" to describe what is clearly censorship in violation of the First Amendment. Trump could have done a lot better than Barrett to fill that vacancy.
Commented: Thursday, June 27th, 2024 @ 10:06 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Republicans must remember the bungling on this set of debates that let the Democrats set the rules, and bad ones at that. Republicans need to come out early with their expected standards. One needs to deal with moderators, and probably the fairest thing is to have two and let each side name one of them. The other has to do with questions, and the Lincoln-Douglas standard of having the campaigns come up with them or at least some of them is a good one. It is too late for this election cycle, but we simply have to get this right in 2028.
Commented: Wednesday, June 26th, 2024 @ 2:06 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
![]() |
Nobody is "nervous, Bob. Trump has more brain power than all three of those aligned against him put together. He can handle being triple teamed. I would like to see an objective and neutral venue for a presidential debate for a change. I have spent too many election cycles watching biased leftwing "moderators" trying to skew the debate to their side. The set up on this one is worse than most. Why should we have one of the moderators who has compared one of the candidates to Hitler? Why should we have the second one being the wife of someone who lied in a disgusting dirty trick that threw the last presidential election? There are plenty of qualified and objective people who could moderate a presidential debate. Why should the American voters be stuck with a pair like that controlling the debate by controlling the questions asked?
Commented: Wednesday, June 26th, 2024 @ 10:48 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|