|
Democrats have a very long history of blaming their opponents for what they are doing themselves. When you hear a Democrat attack, look very closely at the Democrat Party and you will see the very same thing they are trying to blame others for. The lawfare against political opponents is a prime example.
Commented: Tuesday, October 15th, 2024 @ 8:32 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on More panic at the School Board--RevisedElection interference by entities that should stay out of campaigns is something I have seen way too much of. My seven years as Republican district chairman of the old 21-county First Congressional District were at a time when the GOP was first getting real legs in eastern NC, and that resulted too often in election interference. When that happened, as district chairman I went to the mat with the strongest pushback possible. While election interference for a time largely stopped, we have been seeing it at the national level recently.
A school district and its superintendant are among those who should stay out of political campaigns, and when they take sides, that is a case of election interference. The political sign where a mountain has been made out of a mole hill, was not well designed. It is clear that whoever put it together had considerable skill as a graphic artist but no knowledge of political signage. It was cluttered with things like the star and BCS logo that interfered with the main things a candidate needs to get across on a political sign. Political signs are meant to get attension from people driving by, where they only get a quick glance at a sign. A passing motorist is extremely unlikely to even take in the tiny BCS logo, much less comprehend its meaning. The timing of the complaint is very telling as to its nature as election interference. The sign had been out for weeks, but the complaint was not registered until crunch time in the campaign, when candidate time was at a premium and taking yard signs out of play would be particularly damaging. The timeing alone makes this reek of election interference. Then there is the manner in which this was handled, which was completely aimed at a political candidate. If those driving this train really cared about "protecting" a logo, wouldn't they have taken legal steps to do so, such as moving forward to actually register it as a trademark? The fact that they did not speaks volumes on their real motives. The goal seems to be cranking down on a political candidate, not taking steps to legally register this "trademark". The third thing to look at is the nature of their beef. The claim that this logo is a "trademark" is on very shaky ground. No one has ever even tried to follow the staturoy process to register it. The claim of being a "common law trademark" is in a grey area. It might stand up and it might not. That is not something one goes on the warpath over unless they are playing politics. Looking at all aspects of this dispute, it clearly appears based in election interference by a person or group that has no business engaging in politics. While the presence of a tiny representation of this logo on a campaign sign has no impact either way on an election, there seem to be those who think that complaining about it might.
Commented: Friday, October 11th, 2024 @ 11:31 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
What is going to be key for the British Conservative Party is going to be having leadership that will develop a cooperative relationship with the populist right Reform Party led by Nigel Farage. Polling puts both parties close in national support, and indicates that working together, they could achieve a parliamentary majority in the next election. Fighting each other, they will divid the conservative vote and let the left in again. The five seats Reform won in parliament this year were all taken from the Conservatives, but more recently, Reform has been capturing Labour seats in local government special elections. I have read that the Bow Group, the oldest conservative think tank in the UK is not impressed with either candidate in terms of working cooperatively with Reform.
Commented: Friday, October 11th, 2024 @ 11:08 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
If America needs more immigrants, we should take them from the waiting lists of those who apply legally and are turned down because there are not enough slots for them, not from those who arrogantly thumb their noses at our immigration laws and sneak across the border. Legal immigrants are vetted where we know they are not criminals and do have skills that will benefit our economy. We also know from extensive medical tests that they are not disease-ridden. Those that Biden and Harris are letting in include criminals, potential terrorists, and carriers of disease. Many will subsist on public handouts. Legal immigrants are not even eligible for public handouts for five years after arrival and they have to have a citizen provide an affidavit of support agreeing to support them if they cannot do so themselves.
An example of those who want to come legally but when they cannot, they do not slip in illegally is a former employee of mine when I ran an office in Europe. He was our full time accountant, with a college degree, and excellent spoken and written English. His wife was in law school, also with excellent English language skills. Applying legally to immigrate resulting in his being told that there were not enough slots so competition for those that existed was very fierce. At their suggestion, he tried the visa lottery for two years, hoping he would be drawn for one of the slots availible that way, but was not. Finally, he applied to immigrate to Canada, and they took a look at his accounting skills, which were needed in their economy and quickly accepted him provided he pass the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), the medical exam, and other background checks. He passed those easily and took an accounting job on Prince Edward Island, Canada. He is now a Canadian citizen working for an oil company in Alberta. We miss out on the quality immigrants when we make it almost impossible for them to immigrate legally, but then look the other way for whatever turns up unvetted at the border.
Commented: Friday, October 4th, 2024 @ 1:54 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Sample ballot: Our picks for the November electionBob is misrepresenting who it is that removes voters from the rolls in NC. It is the DEMOCRATS who have a majority on the NC state Board of Elections and on ALL 100 county Boards of Elections in North Carolina. At the state level they are ultra-partisan Democrats, at that. THAT is who has the power to remove people from the voter rolls. Republicans are in the minority and do not have that power. Is Bob just uninformed or is he deliberately spouting misinformation?
Commented: Friday, October 4th, 2024 @ 12:18 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Sample ballot: Our picks for the November electionOne caution in using this sample ballot is that you can only vote for one county commission candidate. If you vote for more than one, your ballot will not be counted for that race. This is a result of the lousy "limited voting" system imposed on our county by the Democrats. It stinks but we still have to follow it if we want our votes to count. So for county commission, you have to choose your top candidate and vote only for him.
Commented: Thursday, October 3rd, 2024 @ 8:22 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
We do need to get these heavily biased liberal networks OUT of the debate business. They are neither neutral nor fair and have a very long history of skewing debates to the Democrats and the left.
Rona Romney McDaniel, although generally rather incompetent at RNC, did have one great idea. She pushed through a vote at the Republican National Committee to dump the Commission on Presidential Debates and have the parties negotiate the terms directly. The Commission had a long history of putting pro-Democrat debate moderators in place. Unfortunately, her successor did not follow through, allowing the Biden campaign to jump out first and set debate perameters even worse than the commission. In 2028, the RNC needs to engage early with the DNC on debate arrangements. The most important thing is a fair moderator team. Since finding anyone who is genuinely neutral is almost impossible, and IS impossible in the major media, the best arrangement is to have two moderators, one designated by each side. Like the Lincoln - Douglas debates, the gold standard of American political debates, half of the questions should come from each campaign.
Commented: Wednesday, October 2nd, 2024 @ 9:46 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
The "Indivisible" organization is a real lightning rod in Pennsylvania politics right now. They push the "defund the police" and "end cash bail" movements and have endorsed the Democrat US Senate candidate. This has caused a major pushback from law enforcement organizations which are now falling all over themselves to endorse the Republican senate candidate, saying the Democrat is supported by a "soft on crime" organization.
I had heard of this local radical "Indivisible" group here in Washington a few years ago but had no idea they were still active. From that facebook account it certainly appears that they are.
Commented: Wednesday, October 2nd, 2024 @ 9:34 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
WTIB radio is collecting supplies for the western counties. Glenn Beck's MercuryOne charity is, too.
Commented: Tuesday, October 1st, 2024 @ 11:56 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Beaufort Superintendent and School Board majority deleted Founding Fathers from curriculum requirementsAccording to a student at the Early College High School that I talked to most of the students there cannot even sign their names with cursive. They print their names in block letters. This is the top academic group in the county and it is sad that this life skill has not been taught better in our education system.
I also talked to a school board candidate who taught her own children cursive writing at home because they were not getting it in Beaufort County Schools, and actually had a teacher get upset at her for doing so. Personally, I think there are clearly teachers in our school system who do teach it, but also some that don't or just gloss over it. We need central direction to see that state law is complied with and that all students are fluent in reading and writing in cursive.
Commented: Friday, September 27th, 2024 @ 3:25 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Beaufort Superintendent and School Board majority deleted Founding Fathers from curriculum requirementsA poll of North Carolina parents found that 71% expressed concern about political indoctrination in public school classrooms. This issue came up due to the woke agenda being pushed in the schools, which is mostly leftwing fiction instead of real history. The so-called 1619 Project is a good example, and its creator has even admitted it is not real history. That is the sort of thing the left wants to substitute for real history.
What the woke want to do with our history is the same thing Chairman Mao did with Chinese history. As George Orwell wrote: "The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history."
Commented: Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 @ 5:12 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
The biggest hate-fest I have ever seen was this year's Democrat National Convention. Instead of talking about their own policy proposals, they prefered to launch hate diatribes against Republicans. Bob seems to see things through the prism of leftist ideology and its absurd quirks.
My choice in this year's primary for governor, who I voted for and oontributed to was State Treasurer DAle Folwell, who has stood firm on a wide spectrum of issues for conservative principles. Mark Robinson was a disappointment as Lieutenant Governor due to his constant crawfishing and refusing to take stands on issues of concern to conservatives including the Green New Deal (HB951), the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, gun rights in the Constitutional Carry bill, and Berger's casino fantasy. I wanted a candidate I could depend on in dealing with major issues, and that was Folwell, not Robinson. However, when compared against ultra-liberal Josh Stein, then Robinson, in spite of his deficiencies, is the better choice. Somebody who is wishy-washy on policy is a better choice than a hard core lefty like Stein. For elected officials, I always put records ahead of rhetoric, and that is where Robinson did not pass muster in this year's GOP primary, but where he is nonetheless the better choice against far lefty Stein.
Commented: Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 @ 5:00 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
We ended up with Mark Robinson as our Lieutenant Governor because the 2020 primary for that office had two major candidates, Robinson, whose comments supporting gun rights at the Guilford County Commission had gone viral nationally, and former State Senator Andy Wells of Catawba County, who was in thick with the green energy grifters. Republicans voted on issues, not race, and it was gun rights vs. "green energy".
Most active Republicans I know of voted for Dale Folwell as our nominee as governor, as he had a much better record on a broad range of issues. Unfortunately, Robinson had much better name recogmition with voters overall, partly because the media tended to cover him more than Folwell. For the record, I voted for and supported Robinson for Lt. Governor in 2020, and voted for, contributed to, and supported Dale Folwell for governor in 2024.
Commented: Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 @ 11:19 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Bob seems to think all minorities should stay on the Democrat plantation, but the polls show an increasing number of them are wising up and moving to the GOP. Comparing the Trump economy and inflation with the Biden-Harris economy and inflation should be enough to get any thinking person off of the Democrat plantation.
Commented: Tuesday, September 24th, 2024 @ 10:08 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on The Robinson affair - is it fact or fiction?It is political malpractice that Republican candidates and party leaders are not constantly calling out media bias in this election. Media bias for the Democrats has been documented for decades, but it has never been as bad as in this election. Senator Jesse Helms always called out media bias, constantly reminding voters that he had to run against six opponents, the Democrat candidate plus the editors of the five largest newspapers in the state. In this day and time, it is the alphabet networks of the MSM rather than newspapers, but it is the same issue. When the ABC News coverage of Harris was 100% positive and their coverage of Trump 93% negative, why in the world were they allowed to control a presidential debate? They were wearing their political bias on their sleave.
I voted for and contributed to Folwell. He was clearly our best candidate for governor.
Commented: Monday, September 23rd, 2024 @ 10:41 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
fake asylum claims are what most of the illegal aliens use as an excuse to get over the border, but if we strictly followed the treaties on asylum and refugees, they could all be rejected. The treaties do not obligate a country to allow in someone seeking asylum who is already in a safe country. Mexico and Canada are deemed safe countries, so we could just say NO to anyone trying to enter from there based on asylum claims. This is what Hungary does routinely to turn them away. We could and should do the same.
Commented: Saturday, September 21st, 2024 @ 11:14 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on former Clinton advisor calls for investigation of ABC News for debate rigging against TrumpI guess then that you would claim that the "International Herald Tribune" is not a newspaper because all of its articles are verbatim from either the "Washington Post" or the "New York Times", and that it is not "journalism".
Commented: Thursday, September 19th, 2024 @ 9:41 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on former Clinton advisor calls for investigation of ABC News for debate rigging against TrumpOld school journalism, where its practitioners followed any story no matter who it helped or hurt, told both sides, and were fair and objective, is dying, and is effectively dead as a dodo in the alphabet networks, wire services and major newspapers. It has been replaced by what those who now pose as journalists call "advocacy journalism" where it is all about taking a side and promoting that side. A more accurate term for "advocacy journalism" is "propagnda". That is why the presideintial "news" coverage of ABC News was 100% positive on Kamala Harris and 93% negative on Donald Trump. They were clear partisans and should never have been allowed to control a presidential debate.
Commented: Wednesday, September 18th, 2024 @ 12:59 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
There have been studies going back decades showing heavy political bias in the major networks, so it makes no sense to depend on them to be controlling presidential debates if we want them to be fair and objective. With ABC News coverage this year, it has been 100% positive for Harris and 93% negative for Trump, so why should anyone expect any different in the debate? The problem with the Commission on Presidential Debates was that they always turned to these biased networks for debates.
We had a chance of something better when the RNC dumped the Commission on running the debates, but then failed to follow through and we ended up with something worse. The solution is negotiating debates openly. Realistically, finding knowledgable moderators who are both objective and unbiased is almost impossible in today's polarized society. The best solution is two moderators, one chosen by each side. The fact that a particular side chose a particular moderator will make it damaging if that moderator gets too one-sided and that would act as a safety valve. The other option would be something like a modified Lincoln-Douglas debate, where half the questions came from each candidate. That way neither candidate gets protected by biased moderators from questions they do not want to have to answer. That worked fine for Lincoln and Douglas, so it should be fine for politicians today. Lincoln and Douglas had no moderators at all, but it may be wise to have one moderator who at least keeps time and turns microphones on and off appropriately but has no control over the substance of the debate.
Commented: Monday, September 16th, 2024 @ 1:22 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on former Clinton advisor calls for investigation of ABC News for debate rigging against Trump"Fact check" is the Orwellian Newspeak of the extreme left for what we would call "spin".
Commented: Saturday, September 14th, 2024 @ 5:36 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Political bias to the left has been rampant in the media for decades, but the open rise of "advocacy journalism" in recent years has meant the mask of objectivity has increasingly fallen off. The media is a horrible place to find comeone who should be neutral in a debate setting.
The sad thing is that RNC was working to straighten this problem out but then dropped the ball, allowing the worst manipulation of debates in US presidential election history. The Commission on Presidential Debates has had a history of choosing biased moderators, although not as bad as the ABC News duo, so at Chairman McDaniels initiative the Republican National Committee withdrew from the Commission debates to negotiate debates directly with the Democrats. Her successor, Michael Whatley, then dropped the ball and did not start begotiations. This allowed the Biden camp to put forward their debate plan directly to Trump while Trump was tied up with the Stalin Show Trial in Manhattan and thus had little room to manuever. That allowed the Democrats to, in effect, set the rules. If Michael Whatley had had the competence to follow through on what McDaniel started, we would never have had that ultra-early debate that set up the Democrat coup against Biden, and the Trump - Biden debate would have been what occured Tuesday, too late for the Democrats to oust Biden as nominee. And we certainly would not have had partisan hack moderators like we had Tuesday.
Commented: Thursday, September 12th, 2024 @ 8:43 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
The current presidential debate model in the US is badly brodken. RNC started on the path to fix it, but the current RNC leadership dropped the ball. What we ought to do is go back to the gold standard of American political debates, the Lincoln - Douglas debates, where each candidate provided half the questions, not a sketchy media moderator. They also had no moderator at all, but maybe it would be wise to modify that to at least have a timekeeper to cut microphones on and off. Biased moderators have had way too much control of our presidential debates for years.
Commented: Wednesday, September 11th, 2024 @ 12:03 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
The way the RNC handled the presidential debates is gross political malpractice. First Ronna McDaniel led a vote to abandon the Presidential Debate Commission, which has always tilted the process toward Democrats. So far so good. If RNC had followed through and started negotiations with the Democrats for debates, as they should have, they could have avoided Biden's sudden debate demands catching them flatfooted. After Romney left, her successors failed to follow through. If there had been debate negotiations underway, Biden could never have gotten away with his demand for that very early debate. He would have been wiped out in the first debate, BUT it would have been after the Democrat convention, tying their hands to do anything about it, and Trump would now be facing a demolished Biden and have a cakewalk to November. Instead, thanks to incompetence at RNC we have a competitive race.
Commented: Tuesday, September 10th, 2024 @ 7:12 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
We seem to be lucky that we haven't gotten any here, but Springfield, Ohio got 20,000 Haitians and they now make up 25% of the population of that city. Listen to the video of that city council meeting in Springfield, which has gone viral. Who knows where they will send them in the future? Everybody is at risk, and also of crime gangs.
Commented: Monday, September 9th, 2024 @ 7:47 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
The policies of Biden and Harris have played a big role in the large number of Haitians in the US illegally. Biden and Harris by executive decreee deemed everyone of Haitian origin to be of "Temporary Protected Status" meaning they won't be deported unless that status is revoked. Even Obama did not do that. Biden and Harris have made the US a magnet for Haitians by guaranteeing they will not be deported.
Trump can revoke that when he gets back in office, and send them home, but if Harris stays in, the Haitians will stay indefinitely and keep coming.
Commented: Monday, September 9th, 2024 @ 2:56 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
No, Bob, I am conservative on handling mental health issues, and in doing so with proper due process to protect the rights of the mentally ill. All you seem to care about is taking peoples gund. Committing a mentally ill person puts them in a position to receive treatment, and after a proper court hearing with due process, establish limitations on the mentally ill person to protect himself and the public if he is not institutionalized.
A mentally ill person or a terrorist can kill as many people by driving a car into a crowd as they can with a gun, and the body count in the recent mass knifing by an illegal alien in Germany equaled that of the Georgia school shooting. You have a bad case of tunnel vision, based on your hatred of guns, to think that guns are the only means for mentally ill people or terrorists to commit mayhem.
Commented: Sunday, September 8th, 2024 @ 8:49 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
That kid's online posts about shooting up a school would have been enough for a law enforcement agency to initiate a commitment procedure against him based on his being a threat to himself or others a year before the shooting happened. The FBI knew all about those online threats, but neither they nor local law enforcement did anything. That is where the fault lies. Those civil commitment proceedings are available in all states and have been for many many years. They afford full due process rights. Law enforcement knew about this deranged kid and dropped the ball. Civil commitment laws do a much more thorough job in dealing with the mentally ill and they are already in place.
Commented: Saturday, September 7th, 2024 @ 9:38 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
What is funny is the tantrum being pitched by national Chancellor Schultz of the Social Democrats, whose own party and their national allies got creamed in these elections, demanding that the AfD not be allowed into either state government. Kowtowing to similar demands by Macron in France has just split France's traditional conservative Les Republicains in two, and the CDU faces a similar risk.
The math in Thuringia almost requires including the AfD, which won 32 or the 45 seats needed for a majority. They could get a solid majority either as a right of center coalition with the CDU's 23 seats or a right / left populist coalition with the BSW's 15 seats. Building a coalition led by the CDU is not mathematically possible without including the Left Party, which in Thuringia is the old East German Communist Party. If they rebuke the populist right to go with the barely reformed ex-communists, it is unlikely that CDU voters in Thuringia or elsewhere in Germany would stand for it. Such a coalition would also not be mathematically possible without having both the Left Party and the BSW both in it, and there is lots of bad blood betwwen those two parties. Saxony also has challenging math. To get a 61 seat majority, the most logical is combining the CDU's 41 seats and the AfD's 40 seats. That is the only two party coalition that is even possible and for either to build a multi-party coalition would require a lot of strange bedfellows.
Commented: Wednesday, September 4th, 2024 @ 9:11 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
Anyone who calls Sen. James Lankford a "right winger" is either badly misinformed or deliberately distorting the facts. When Lankford ran for an open Senate seat in 2014, he was the establishment candidate in that primary. I well remember it because his conservative challenger, T.W. Shannon was one of the candidates I contributed to that election cycle.
T.W. Shannon was Speaker of the Oklahoma State House, an African-American with enough Cherokee blood to be an enrolled member of the tribe, and a staunch conservative. His endorsements ranged from national conservative PAC's like the Senate Conservatives Fund to prominent conservative leaders like Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, and Mike Lee to local Oklahoma Tea Party organizations. Lankford, on the other hand, was the candidate of the Mitch McConnell wing of the party. He had been elected to the US House as a Baptist minister who talked conservatve but quickly disappointed conservatives with his voting record, his votes on some key tax and spend bills being the ones that drew the most ire. That was a very clear choice in the primary, with Shannon being the conservative and Lankford the moderate establishment type. If that continuing disappointment Lankford runs again, I wonder who the conservative will be who brings him home. After his stupid Open Borders bill, I will be motivated to again contribute in an Oklanhoma US Senate primary. I think the dumbest thing Lankford said in trying to defend his open borders bill was trying to equate illegal aliens with legal immigrants.
Commented: Monday, September 2nd, 2024 @ 1:57 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
|
I don't see how anyone with any sanity can remain in today's loony left Un-Democratic Party.
Commented: Saturday, August 31st, 2024 @ 11:35 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Heartburn at the Beaufort County School BoardVan Zant - The seating arrangement of the BC School Board has also always struck me as very odd. It is not only totally different from other local government bodies, but also from the state boards and commissions I used to work with. When I served as a departmental General Counsel in the Jim Martin administration, one of my responsibilities was to monitor the rulemaking boards and commissions housed under our department such as the NC Social Services Commission, NC Child Daycare Commission, and NC Mental Health Commission for the cabinet secretary who administered the department. Those sommissions were staffed by top officials of the division or section handling the appropriate policy area. Staff, including division directors or section chiefs were not seated with the commission itself, but down the side, much like many of our local governments. Seating paid staff among board or commission members is just strange.
Commented: Wednesday, August 28th, 2024 @ 6:05 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Heartburn at the Beaufort County School BoardWill, what you linked to was the second draft by conservative school board members, not the final Cheeseman draft. The final Cheeseman draft took OUT those things you mentioned.
Commented: Wednesday, August 28th, 2024 @ 8:05 am
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Heartburn at the Beaufort County School BoardThe woke agenda involves lots of things and using things like the 1619 project instead of real history is indeed part of it, but so are things like radical gender theory. Actually, I am a big fan of British public education law that requires teachers to present both sides of any politically contested theory or issue. Students should be presented with both sides. I have never heard of one of the woke fairy tales that does tnat. Indeed the inventor of the 1619 Project admits that it is not history. That also applies to science, where I doubt many teachers are teaching both sides of the science on climate issues.
Commented: Tuesday, August 27th, 2024 @ 5:52 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|
Commented on Heartburn at the Beaufort County School BoardBath parent, there is an important issue being addressed all over the country that has nothing to do with any personalities in Beaufort County, either Richardson or Cheeseman, and that is whether public schools will have a woke curriculum or a more traditional curriculum. It is a battle between parents, who polls show that in NC 71% are concerned about political indoctrination of their chidlren in the classroom, and the woke education establishment in Raleigh. Governor Cooper has put some really far out leftists on the state school board.
As the legal staff of the General Assembly pointed out, correctly, to Representative Kidwell, county boards of education have absolute authority in choosing a curriculum and do not have to kowtow to the woke state board of education. The original draft of the new local curriculum policy recognized that right. The changes announced by Cheeseman waved a white flag to kowtow to the Raleigh education establishment. That was a big blow to local control of local schools. Raleigh has been trying to assert too much control of local schools for decades. I remember a couple of meetings of the old Pitt-Beaufort Conservative Union back in the late 1970s, when one of our members, a conservative Democrat who was school board attorney for Pitt County told us a big part of his work for the schools was fighting off efforts by Raleigh to tell the local schools what to do when Raleigh had no legal basis to assert such control. The only thing that seems to have changed on this front is less backbone among local leaders to fight it.
Commented: Tuesday, August 27th, 2024 @ 5:24 pm
By: Steven P. Rader
|