Highlighting Biden’s Stance on Guns | Eastern NC Now

John Daniel Davidson of the Federalist places a recent hubbub involving Joe Biden into a larger context.

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    John Daniel Davidson of the Federalist places a recent hubbub involving Joe Biden into a larger context.

  • Set aside Joe Biden's weirdly aggressive response to the Detroit auto plant worker who challenged him on gun control policy at a campaign stop yesterday-Biden tells the guy, "you're full of sh-t," calls him a "horse's ass," and later threatens to slap him in the face-and consider instead how the blue-check media exulted in it.
  • Instead of noting how Biden distorted his record, or that he was factually wrong on almost every particular about guns, pundits and reporters focused on the optics, on how great it was that Biden stood up to a random voter who dared to question him. ...
  • ... Biden ... told the Detroit man the government "would take your AR-14s" (no such gun exists), and that AR-15s are "machine guns" (nope) that are "illegal" (they aren't). After this string of false statements, Biden then blurts out, without context, "Do you need 100 rounds? Do you need 100 rounds?!"
  • By contrast, the auto plant worker's remark that triggered the exchange was a straightforward statement of fact: "You are actively trying to diminish our Second Amendment rights and take away our guns." Any plain reading of Biden's proposed gun control policies-like banning AR-15s, the most popular gun in America-is consistent with that statement.
  • What's more, the man accurately references comments Biden made at rally on March 2 while accepting the endorsement of Beto O'Rourke. Biden said, "I'm going to guarantee this is not the last you've seen of this guy," referring to O'Rourke. "You're going to take care of the gun problem with me. You're going to be the one who leads this effort."
  • How else can one interpret that except as an endorsement of gun confiscation? After all, it was O'Rourke who in a September debate boasted, "Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47."

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




A Health Care Challenge for GOP John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics On Redistricting Reform ‘Who’ Is Less Important Than ‘What’


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

fortunately this travesty has not yet come to Beaufort County, but it has in Virginia
now Fauci should be indicted for his previous lies under oath to Congress
Queen Garris has made a post on the Beaufort County GOP site that you should read. It is disloyal to conservative candiates key in the following: https://www.Facebook.Com/beaufortcountygop
another reason we need the SAVE America Act that Democrat politicians fear
Throughout the evening, the fireworks and other program events competed with uncooperative weather.

HbAD1

spending spree came from deceptively named "Inflation Reduction Act"
follows up on mass anti-immigration riots in Belfast, Northern Ireland

HbAD2

“Neville Singham has been a mechanism and funding arm of the Chinese Communist Party.”
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
wrongful stops and possible people tacking including cell phones

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top