Harris Signals Nature of Supreme Court Confirmation Fight | Eastern NC Now

A weekend statement from Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris offers a hint about the pending fight over President Trump’s latest Supreme Court nomination.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    A weekend statement from Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris offers a hint about the pending fight over President Trump's latest Supreme Court nomination. Naomi Lim reports for the Washington Examiner.

  • Sen. Kamala Harris ripped President Trump's Supreme Court pick in a searing statement, setting up a showdown between the 2020 Democratic vice presidential nominee and Judge Amy Coney Barrett when she appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee next month.
  • "Just yesterday, I paid my respects to the legendary Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who devoted her life to fighting for Equal Justice Under Law and a more fair and just world," Harris wrote Saturday. "Her passing is devastating, and it would be a travesty to replace her with a justice who is being selected to undo her legacy and erase everything she did for our country."
  • She added, "With the next Supreme Court Justice set to determine the fate of protections for those with preexisting health conditions, and reproductive health options, I will continue to fight on behalf of the people and strongly oppose the president's nomination."
  • Harris, a California senator, sent out her statement via her congressional press office rather than through her and 2020 Democratic standard-bearer Joe Biden's campaign. The move suggests she's preparing for a commanding role in Barret's confirmation hearings, slated to start Oct. 12 and expected to last three days.
  • Harris, like many Democrats, linked Barrett's appointment to a critical Obamacare case on the Supreme Court's docket for Nov. 10 amid the coronavirus pandemic. She also referenced Senate Majority Mitch McConnell's refusal to advance former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court candidate Judge Merrick Garland in 2016 because it was an election year.
  • "Americans across the country are already casting votes, and we will soon know the president and senators who will be sworn in next January," she said. "We must respect Americans' voices and allow the winners of the election to nominate and confirm the next Supreme Court Justice."

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




John Locke Foundation: Prudent Policy / Impeccable Research - Volume DLIX John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics First Debate Highlights the ‘Battle of the Preppers’


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Questionable finances, corruption and dictatorship round out another Executive Committee meeting.
illegal migration also drives up healthcare, insurance, and other costs for Americans

HbAD1

America's formerly greatest museum has become a bad political joke
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
says foreign ties of Democrat Socialists of America need to be investigated

HbAD2

massive data collection by license plate readers on highways and streets threaten freedom
“I’m from America, 250 years ago we were way bigger than 6/1 dogs, and look at us thriving now.” Justin Gaethje pulls off an all time sports upset.
There are many people who overlook the brilliance of the US Constitution. They argue that it is outdated and unfit to adequately govern such a modern nation as ours in the 21st century.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top