On the Overuse of ‘Scary’ To Describe Politics | Eastern NC Now

Kevin Williamson of National Review Online is no fan of the overuse of one particular word in political discourse.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Kevin Williamson of National Review Online is no fan of the overuse of one particular word in political discourse.

  • One of the words I would abolish from our political lexicon is "scary." It is an insipid, empty adjective with its roots in "one weird trick"-style digital gimmickry, beloved of such master click-baiters as the editors over at Vox. A recent example comes from our friends ("If a man's character is to be abused, there's nobody like a relation to do the business") over at The Bulwark, which carried a headline reading: "The Scary Spectacle of Trump's Last Month in Office." ...
  • ... "Scary" used in this way is irritating for a half a dozen reasons. One of them is that it is a base-stealing stratagem, a way of suggesting, usually in a headline, that the following matter is shocking or revelatory. And what follows almost always is something that is neither shocking nor revelatory. In the Bulwark piece, the "scary" headline is undercut by the copy itself: "The final days of the Donald Trump administration are upon us, and they look much like every other day at the White House for the last four years." To which some might reply: "Oh, but every other day at the White House for the last four years has been scary, too!"
  • In which case, grow the ... heck ... up.
  • Scary is a weak and dishonest means of gaining influence, with the writer ordering readers to feel a certain way about a subject rather than causing them to feel that way, which takes a little bit of effort and skill. If you were to read a straightforward account of the crimes of Jack the Ripper, nobody would need to tell you that you should be shocked and disgusted by them. Margaret Thatcher did not need to tell anybody that she was a lady, or that she was powerful — the facts of the case were enough.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Five Political Questions for 2021 John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Conservative Conflict Over Big Tech


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

ruling leaves congressional districts intact = huge blow to Spanberger
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD1

If you are covering Roy Cooper in Greensboro today, please consider the following statement from the Republican National Committee:
Obama and Biden judges abuse power for political reasons to try to stop Haitian deportations
teachers union rally held on major socialist / communist May Day holiday
Democrats foment climate of violence against Trump and GOP

HbAD2

Cheryl Hines. Dennis Quaid. Nicki Minaj. All became associated with the Trump administration. What happened next?
A federal grand jury in North Carolina has indicted former FBI Director James Comey on two charges related to making threats against President Donald Trump.
Their goal was simple: to put a Planned Parenthood in every mailbox in America.
Treasury officials allege these groups pose as humanitarian entities while covertly siphoning donations to Hamas.
President Donald Trump has publicly floated regime change and other aggressive actions toward Cuba.
With a new roadside plaque unveiled in Ellerbe on April 23, legendary wrestler and local resident André René Roussimoff is finally getting the formal recognition fans believe he deserves.
Following a string of attacks, critics are calling for denaturalizations. It's not that simple.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top