The Impact of Warren’s Ultra-Millionaire Tax Bill | Eastern NC Now

David Lesperance examines likely consequences of U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s latest attack on American wealth.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    David Lesperance examines likely consequences of U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren's latest attack on American wealth.

  • After weeks of tough talk Senator Elizabeth Warren has now thrown down the gauntlet. The Ultra-Millionaires tax bill has been announced. Its highlights include:
    • A 2% annual tax on worldwide assets of all types between US$50M and US$1B and
    • A 3% tax over US$1B.
  • In some circles the idea of a Wealth Tax is being soft pedalled. There are suggestions that it should be “one-time” or “one- off” and not recurring. No doubt this is to soften the philosophical rough edges of Senator Warren’s proposal.
  • Unfortunately for Wealth Tax advocates of all types, the targets of these proposals are simply not buying their argument. This is because they know their history… where numerous one-time or temporary taxes became permanent. They have seen, time and again, that when the originating crisis could not instantly be solved… or when other issues came to the forefront… there was the inevitable need for the on-going revenues that these “temporary” taxes reliably generated.
  • There has been a huge response to the announcement of the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Bill. …
  • … More fundamentally, the loudest opponents question the constitutionality of a federal Wealth Tax. Warren has attempted to pre-empt this objection. She cited several legal scholars who claim that such a tax is in fact constitutional. These academic opinions might give supportive politicians the political cover to implement a Wealth Tax, even if there is a possibility that it might be overturned at some point in the distant future.
  • However, there is a risk in wealthy Americans relying on such a future legal decision. This was succinctly stated by an UHNW American client. In response to one advisor’s statement that the Ultra-Millionaire’s tax was unconstitutional, this clear-eyed client responded,
  • “And how many years of wealth tax and legal fees will I pay before the US Supreme Court agrees with you?”

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




California Schools Could Get Especially Kooky Curriculum John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Homosexuality is a sin...because the Bible says so


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Beaufort County residents deserve lower taxes and should demand them from government.
Cheryl Hines. Dennis Quaid. Nicki Minaj. All became associated with the Trump administration. What happened next?
"Pay no attention to the folks behind the curtain" was their preference but things are beginning to come to light.
Understanding how parties work is important for making informed decisions regarding elected officials.

HbAD1

Two years ago, new media brought President Trump back to the White House. What happened?
Victims’ advocates, prosecutors, law enforcement officials, and families impacted by violent crime gathered Tuesday at the North Carolina State Archives building in Raleigh to recognize National Crime Victims’ Rights Week and honor those affected by crime across North Carolina.
The POLITICO poll found that almost half of respondents think Hollywood players should "be less vocal with their political beliefs."
Provincial governments in Alberta and Saskatchewan refuse to cooperate with federal gov.t

HbAD2

"They help cultivate a radical hate America agenda, and we can't afford that same toxic ideology in America's War Department.”
The attack comes amid a heightened concern over terror attacks after President Donald Trump launched "Operation Epic Fury" in Iran.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top