Battle Against Big Tech Monopoly Features Key Flaws | Eastern NC Now

Alan Reynolds writes at National Review Online about critical problems within common arguments against Big Tech.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Alan Reynolds writes at National Review Online about critical problems within common arguments against Big Tech.

  • Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Google are being threatened with costly antitrust suits and possible dismemberment for having unfairly secured a "monopoly" of something or other. This crusade has spurred congressional hearings and bills, in addition to several executive orders from President Biden. This political campaign reflects, as the Wall Street Journal put it, "a new Democratic emphasis on restraining the nation's most powerful companies."
  • The new trustbusters are hoping to remake antitrust law into a lawyers' combat sport with unpredictable ad hoc rules - antitrust for fun and profit. A New York Times headline predicts good times for key players: "Boom Times for Lawyers as Washington Pursues Big Tech." But overheated politicians and opportunistic lawyers may not be enough to keep these lucrative games going for long. Sooner or later, all the scattergun monopoly charges will have to confront logic and evidence.
  • In the scramble to drum up antitrust objections to the four alleged Big Tech monopolies, congressional aides and compliant journalists invariably make two crucial mistakes. First, they adopt indefensibly narrow definitions of the markets that have supposedly been monopolized. Second, they confuse popularity with dominance.
  • Consider that first stumbling block, which requires defining the relevant market. Whenever any firm is accused of having a monopoly, the first question to ask is: "A monopoly of what?" Facebook shows how hard it can be to answer such a seemingly easy question.
  • In dismissing an ill-fated Federal Trade Commission antitrust suit against Facebook, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg noted that "the FTC alleges only that Facebook has 'maintained a dominant share of the U.S. personal social networking market (in excess of 60%)' since 2011." He added that "the Court is . . . unable to understand exactly what the agency's '60%-plus' figure is even referring to, let alone able to infer the underlying facts that might substantiate it."

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Former Democratic Senator Mugged by California’s Reality John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Did You Know? New UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Members


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

ruling leaves congressional districts intact = huge blow to Spanberger
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
If you are covering Roy Cooper in Greensboro today, please consider the following statement from the Republican National Committee:

HbAD1

Obama and Biden judges abuse power for political reasons to try to stop Haitian deportations
teachers union rally held on major socialist / communist May Day holiday
Democrats foment climate of violence against Trump and GOP
Cheryl Hines. Dennis Quaid. Nicki Minaj. All became associated with the Trump administration. What happened next?

HbAD2

A federal grand jury in North Carolina has indicted former FBI Director James Comey on two charges related to making threats against President Donald Trump.
Their goal was simple: to put a Planned Parenthood in every mailbox in America.
Treasury officials allege these groups pose as humanitarian entities while covertly siphoning donations to Hamas.
President Donald Trump has publicly floated regime change and other aggressive actions toward Cuba.
With a new roadside plaque unveiled in Ellerbe on April 23, legendary wrestler and local resident André René Roussimoff is finally getting the formal recognition fans believe he deserves.
Following a string of attacks, critics are calling for denaturalizations. It's not that simple.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top