Socialism and Corporations | Eastern NC Now

Iain Murray describes at National Review Online a love-hate relationship between socialists and corporations.

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    Iain Murray describes at National Review Online a love-hate relationship between socialists and corporations.

  • Socialists would rather the traditional American firm did not exist. Animosity towards the capitalist boss for reaping all the rewards of his employees' labor, or (perhaps worse) towards the joint-stock corporation, where workers don't even know who they're being exploited by, is a staple of socialist rhetoric. Ideally corporations would be replaced by worker-owned cooperatives or nationalized sectoral industries, but if not, they'll be strictly controlled through regulation, and their owners and stockholders taxed to oblivion.
  • Margaret Thatcher called this "the politics of envy." Her message that it was sinful successfully countered the idea that profit is about greed and turned the British Labour Party from a democratic-socialist party to a social-democracy party for over two decades.
  • But now the politics of envy is back in a big way. Not only are corporations accused of greed, they are alleged to be destroying the planet. New-style businesses such as Uber are accused of not just exploiting workers but outright cheating them. Yet increasingly socialists, realizing the political impossibility of getting rid of the corporations, are turning to co-opting them instead. ...
  • ... For the past century, that structure has been under attack by socialist activists, who have long viewed corporations as ideological battlegrounds, with management arrayed against workers. You will probably notice there a shift in target from Marx: Management is the enemy, not ownership. In fact, much of the Naderite-era attack on corporations was based on the idea that corporate management did not act in the stockholder owners' interest. ...
  • ... There are two reasons that socialists want to see this structure continue. First, it gives government agencies immense power over employment conditions. Second, large corporations are easier to unionize than smaller companies. And the dues paid by employees for union representation — which they may not even want — make large corporations a huge source of funds for political campaigns.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Credential Inflation: What’s Causing It and What Can We Do About It? John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Nevada’s Mail-In Voting and Possible Nationwide Implications


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

It's a perfect storm of the decline of local lumber industries and the policies put in place to (mis)manage Canadian forests.
great article from American Greatness

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

that what happens when you run as a "moderate" but turn hard core leftist once in power

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top