‘Pen-And-Phone’ Constitutionalism Causes Concerns | Eastern NC Now

Yuval Levin and Adam White explain at National Review Online why they worry about the return of a particular presidential approach once touted by Barack Obama.

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    Yuval Levin and Adam White explain at National Review Online why they worry about the return of a particular presidential approach once touted by Barack Obama.

  • On Saturday, President Trump put his name to four executive actions — three presidential memoranda and one executive order — intended to offer some relief to Americans dealing with the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. The premise of these actions, made explicit in the text of each, was that Congress had failed to act and now the chief executive has to step in. It is a premise fundamentally at odds with the logic of our constitutional order, and it points to a number of dangerous dysfunctions in the American system of government that are now thoroughly bipartisan.
  • As a matter of substantive policy action, there is less to these four actions than might meet the eye. ...
  • ... As real relief, these measures are precarious and weak. But as exertions of executive authority, the latter two memoranda in particular are constitutionally dangerous. That is not to say that a judge would necessarily throw them out; they are substantively weak because they are written to avoid expressly violating any law. And if the Constitution is just a law as well, then there are surely justifications that the administration's lawyers could offer for both memos that might satisfy the federal courts.
  • But if the Constitution is more than a law, if it establishes a system of government with a particular character, then there could hardly be any question that a presidential action explicitly setting out to change federal policy regarding both spending and taxing, and to do so precisely because Congress has declined to take these steps, violates that character.
  • The president did not even attempt to deny that he was stepping into Congress's terrain and taking actions that are in essence legislative.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Don’t Take Choices From Low-Income Families John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Evidence That Americans Are Fighting Back, Figuratively


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

(RALEIGH) Today, Governor Stein announced he has signed one bill into law.
Mexican equivalent of ICE conducting raids on migrants in Mexico City
“President Trump has always been clear about short-term disruptions as a result of Operation Epic Fury."

HbAD1

ruling leaves congressional districts intact = huge blow to Spanberger
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

If you are covering Roy Cooper in Greensboro today, please consider the following statement from the Republican National Committee:
Obama and Biden judges abuse power for political reasons to try to stop Haitian deportations
teachers union rally held on major socialist / communist May Day holiday
Democrats foment climate of violence against Trump and GOP

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top