Panning the Decision To Back Out of Key Trade Deal | Eastern NC Now

Editors at National Review Online remind us about the costly decision to remove the United States from an important trade agreement.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Editors at National Review Online remind us about the costly decision to remove the United States from an important trade agreement.

  • Within weeks of his 2016 election victory, President Trump announced plans to withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a multilateral trade deal intended to build an economic bulwark against China. That decision paved the way for this weekend's signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a free-trade agreement between China and 14 Asian neighbors.
  • The RCEP — signed by the ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations as well as Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea — covers 2.3 billion people, making it the largest-ever trade agreement, even after India's withdrawal scaled it back. Though of marginal material consequence to the global economy, its signing represents another step in China's march to regional dominance.
  • The RCEP will phase out most tariffs between member countries over a 20-year period, a provision that essentially replicates existing trade arrangements. Indeed, previous deals with much more comprehensive and stringent rules have already achieved most of the trade liberalization included in the RCEP, muting its effect. ...
  • ... It does, though, contain one significant provision instituting a common rule of origin. Whereas previously businesses had to attain various certifications to ship products between member countries, they now need just one so-called certificate of origin. That makes supply-chain management easier and could incentivize companies to locate more of their production in the region. ...
  • ... Still, the sheer extent of the trade zone should worry Washington, which has missed opportunity after opportunity to convert the grievances of China's neighbors into meaningful policy victories. If previous ASEAN agreements are any indication, the scope of the RCEP is likely to expand over time. And those nations most willing to partner with the U.S. against China — Japan and South Korea — rank among the largest beneficiaries of the agreement.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Biden To Fill White House With Corporate Lobbyists John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Beasley’s Protests Land With a Thud at Democrat Controlled Boards


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Questionable finances, corruption and dictatorship round out another Executive Committee meeting.
illegal migration also drives up healthcare, insurance, and other costs for Americans

HbAD1

America's formerly greatest museum has become a bad political joke
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
says foreign ties of Democrat Socialists of America need to be investigated

HbAD2

massive data collection by license plate readers on highways and streets threaten freedom
“I’m from America, 250 years ago we were way bigger than 6/1 dogs, and look at us thriving now.” Justin Gaethje pulls off an all time sports upset.
There are many people who overlook the brilliance of the US Constitution. They argue that it is outdated and unfit to adequately govern such a modern nation as ours in the 21st century.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top