Google Agrees To $391.5 Million Settlement In Location Tracking Case | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Charlotte Pence Bond.

    Google has agreed to a settlement with 40 states regarding charges related to unwanted location tracking of customers.

    The company will pay $391.5 million in a settlement regarding claims that it kept tracking customers after they had shut off location tracking. A group of state prosecutors announced the agreement on Monday, and the attorneys general said it was the biggest multistate privacy settlement ever paid.

    Officials claimed that since at least 2014, Google has deceived users about what times it was tracking them and violated consumer protection laws in doing so. It secretly tracked them when they thought they weren't sharing their location, and then used the information for online marketers to sell ads.

    The attorneys general said that up until May 2018, the company was even keeping track of consumers' locations who had logged out of Google applications.

    "For years, Google prioritized profit over the privacy of people who use Google products and services," Ellen Rosenblum, the Oregon attorney general, said. Rosenblum spearheaded the case alongside Nebraska. "Consumers thought they had turned 'off' their location tracking features on Google, but the company continued to secretly record their movements and use that information for advertisers."

    The company's location tracking abilities have been a concern across the nation. Google is being sued by other jurisdictions as well, such as Washington, D.C., Indiana, and Texas for allegedly misleading location tracking. It already settled a location tracking lawsuit with Arizona last month for $85 million.

    A Google spokesperson told NPR in a statement that the strategies the prosecutors pointed to are antiquated and have since been changed.

    "Consistent with improvements we've made in recent years, we have settled this investigation which was based on outdated product policies that we changed years ago," Google Spokesperson José Castañeda said.

    After the settlement, Google posted a message on its blog, saying, "[a]s well as a financial settlement, we will be making updates in the coming months to provide even greater controls and transparency over location data."

    The changes involve including "additional disclosures" for certain pages and "creating a single, comprehensive information hub that highlights key location settings to help people make informed choices about their data." The company will also offer a new tool that lets users shut off "their Location History and Web & App Activity settings and delete their past data in one simple flow." It will also provide more information to users creating new accounts about "what Web & App Activity is, what information it includes, and how it helps their Google experience."

poll#128
Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?
  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.
  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.
  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".
476 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Jon Voight Sends Message Of Hope After Midterm Losses: ‘A Change Is Coming’ Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Rick Scott Announces Bid To Oust McConnell As Senate GOP Leader


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Atheist Soros, although born Jewish, was Nazi collaborator in Hungary in WWII
anti-immigration conservative nationalist beats Social Democrat incumbent 2 to 1
Biden wants to push this in public schools and Gov. deSantis says NO
this at the time that pro-Hamas radicals are rioting around the country

HbAD1

populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

 
Back to Top