What Ohio Learned About Vouchers

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.85% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

1.15% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
87 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Published: Thursday, December 29th, 2022 @ 3:19 pm
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Robert Luebke.

    How do voucher programs impact district achievement, segregation, or district per pupil expenditures?

    These are questions that have dogged voucher programs for a long, long time.

    Yesterday the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation released a comprehensive study that explored the impacts of Ohio's largest voucher program, the Educational Choice Scholarship Program (EdChoice) on school enrollment, finances, and academic outcomes.

    Researchers found:

The EdChoice Program led to modest achievement gains in district academic success.
High participation rates of Black and Hispanic Students in EdChoice (55 percent of recipients in 2018-19) has actually helped communities that have historically been segregated.
EdChoice did not drain money from districts but had a neutral fiscal impact. This happened since local funding per student tends to rise when student exit for private options, while state support usually declines.

The Fordham Study which analyzed thirteen years of data is available here.

Go Back