Federal Judge Rules That Trump Must Reinstate DACA Program | Eastern NC Now

On Tuesday evening, U.S. District Judge John Bates ruled that President Trump could not legally end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, arguing that Trump would have to begin reissuing temporary visas again.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This informational nugget was sent to me by Ben Shapiro, who represents the Daily Wire, and since this is one of the most topical news events, it should be published on BCN.

    On Tuesday evening, U.S. District Judge John Bates ruled that President Trump could not legally end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, arguing that Trump would have to begin reissuing temporary visas again. He called the decision to end DACA "arbitrary and capricious because the Department failed adequately to explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful."

    So, in other words, if a president takes an executive action, then the subsequent president cannot undo that executive action - even if that original executive action has been declared unconstitutional, at least in part.

    This is insanity - or, as Michael Brendan Dougherty of National Review put it, it's "Calvinball," the inane game created by cartoon character Calvin of Calvin and Hobbes, who arbitrarily changed the rules of the game when convenient. Here's how leftist courts have now ruled: an action that is obviously unconstitutional is no longer unconstitutional when performed by President Obama; undoing that unconstitutional action is unconstitutional if performed by President Trump. Hence the bewilderment of the Department of Justice, whose spokesperson answered, "Today's order doesn't change the Department of Justice's position on the facts: DACA was implemented unilaterally after Congress declined to extend benefits to this same group of illegal aliens."

    Whether you oppose or support DACA is irrelevant here. What is far more relevant is whether the courts are performing their actual function - legitimate interpretation of the law - or whether they're simply rubber-stamping policy with which they agree.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




British Authorities Crack Down On Nazi Dogs And Angry Drivers While Forcing Parents To Watch Their Baby Die Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Judicial Debate has Deep Roots


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD1

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

she was actually 86, and says she did not vote in the 51 elections records show
"We are leveraging counterterrorism tools and global partnerships to deter this threat before it metastasizes," an official shared.
The impressions of our youth are indelibly branded in our hearts and minds. As I think of June 6, 1944 (D Day) it always seems that it was my war. I was nine years old.
Not giving our kids their own devices was one of the best parenting decisions my husband and I made.

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top