No Impeachment Trial Before Trump’s Term Ends, but That Might Not Stop Congress | Eastern North Carolina Now

Ed Morrissey writes at HotAir.com about a potential timeline for presidential impeachment. Prospects for such an action remain uncertain.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Ed Morrissey writes at HotAir.com about a potential timeline for presidential impeachment. Prospects for such an action remain uncertain.

  • No one will be busy in Washington DC on January 20, right? No social events on the calendar? According to a new memo from Mitch McConnell and given to the Washington Post, any impeachment trial of Donald Trump would begin at the earliest on that day, no sooner than 1 pm ET — an hour after Trump won't need to be removed from office anyway. ...
  • ... That might seem rather pointless, as Trump won't be in the office at that point to be removed from it. However, an impeachment affords Congress the opportunity to bar Trump from any federal office in the future (as it does for impeachments of other federal officials), and that might be enough to pursue impeachment, especially for Democrats.
  • That does raise another question, though: can Congress impeach a private citizen who is no longer in federal office? The answer is — no one really knows. A year ago there was some significant debate over that point, but the only real consensus is that there is no consensus, and even more to the point, no certainty even among those who have an opinion. The Constitution provides Congress the authority to impeach presidents and vice presidents, judges, and "all civil officers" in Article II Section 4, an explicit list which would seem to preclude anyone who isn't currently in one of those categories. Arguably, any such effort against a private citizen could conceivably be considered an act of attainder, which is explicitly prohibited by Article I, Sections 9 and 10. Under that theory, any prosecutorial action would have to take place in civil courts and not Congress. But until Congress tries it and the result gets challenged in court, it remains a mystery ... sort of like presidential self-pardons.

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Trashed Capitol Should Revolt Us All John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics NC Bars and Taverns Struggle To Stay Afloat


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Please attend the public meetings and speak out against closing the Snowden school in Aurora.
this undemocratic attempt to seize presidential power for themselves must be crushed
filed by former lawmaker from small center-right Free Democrats

HbAD1

Commissioner Richardson requests information regarding the new Washington school from BCS Superintendent
parental rights at stake, schools allowed no opt outs for parents
Demcorats took unpopular radical positions to please Soros pressure groups
“California accounted for 68% of the unemployment benefits paid to parolees identified by CBP on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records.”
the votes are not there in the Senate, but that will not stop subpoenas from the House

HbAD2

Democrats claims of needing a liberal law to do so shown to be nonsense
populist nationalist anti-immigration Reform Party would be largest in parliament
comes a week after British Supreme Court rules that there are only two genders

HbAD3

 
Back to Top